Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781306›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2019

PI3K/AKT Signaling in Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping and Lymph Node Involvement.

S Bonin, D Pracella, R Barbazza, I Dotti, S Boffo, G Stanta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. SDC4-rs1981429 and ATM-rs228590 may provide early biomarkers of breast cancer risk.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

S BoninDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-0296
D PracellaDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0816-247X
R BarbazzaDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-1155
I DottiDepartment of Gastroenterology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain.
S BoffoSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biology, Temple University, 1900 N. 12th St., Philadelphia, PA 19122-6017, USA.
G StantaDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node metastatic involvement persists to be among the most important predictors of recurrence and survival in breast carcinoma (BC). This study is aimed at investigating possible gene expression differences in primary BC between patients with or without lymph node involvement at the time of diagnosis. In a retrospective study, we investigated the potential prognostic role of 9 candidate biomarkers at the mRNA level in a cohort of 305 breast cancer patients, 151 lymph node-negative (LN-) and 154 lymph node-positive (LN+) individuals. The analyzed genes belonged to the RAS pathway (RAF1, ERBB2, PIK3CB, AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3), RB pathway (RB1 and CDK2), and cellular differentiation (KRT8). Their expression profiles were investigated by RT-qPCR and were correlated to immunohistochemically based molecular subtypes and BC clinical and pathological features. The differential expression of several genes in the primary tumor tissue was related to the LN involvement. Some of those genes, including PIK3CB, RB1, and AKT3, were more expressed in LN- BC patients, while some others, notably ERBB2 and AKT1, in LN+ ones. Among the candidate biomarkers, the expression levels of AKT isoforms influenced also patients' survival rates. In detail, higher expression levels of AKT1 and AKT2 negatively influenced overall patients' survival, and in particular, AKT2 expression levels defined a group of luminal B BC patients with shorter cancer-specific survival. On the contrary, longer cancer-specific survival was recorded in luminal A BC patients with higher expression levels of AKT3. That finding was also confirmed by Cox multivariate analysis. The same AKT3 resulted to be a possible candidate predictive biomarker for Tamoxifen response. In conclusion, our study highlighted the complex regulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in BC and its differences in BC patients with and without lymph node involvement.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktReceptors, EstrogenBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID31781306
PMCPMC6875411
OpenAlexW2987714638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.