Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781197›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2019

Development of a Novel Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Robot Enabling Complete Remote Control of All Operations: Endoscopic Therapeutic Robot System (ETRS).

Keiichiro Kume, Nobuo Sakai, Toru Ueda

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of therapeutic digestive endoscopy robots: a narrative review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Flexible robotic endoscopy for treating gastrointestinal neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keiichiro KumeThird Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0444-4739
Nobuo SakaiDepartment of Applied Science for Integrated System Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan.
Toru UedaDepartment of Applied Science for Integrated System Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan.
Kyushu Institute of Technology · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and other flexible endoscopy platforms are designed primarily for the remote control of forceps, with manipulation of the endoscope itself still dependent on conventional techniques. We have developed an endoscopic therapeutic robot system (ETRS) that provides complete remote control of all forceps and endoscope operations.

methodWe carried out endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in porcine stomachs using the ETRS. All procedures were completed with the endoscopist seated at the console the entire time.

resultsTotal en bloc resection was achieved in all 7 cases with no complications. The mean total procedure time was 36.14 ± 14.98 min, the mean size of the resected specimen was 3.39 ± 0.66 cm × 3.03 ± 0.63 cm, and the mean dissection time was 14.91 ± 8.61 min.

conclusionWe successfully used the ETRS to perform completely remote-controlled ESD in porcine stomachs.

Identifiers

PMID31781197
PMCPMC6875422
OpenAlexW2989075082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.