ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019
Ensuring Best Practice in Genomic Education and Evaluation: A Program Logic Approach.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Pathway Initiative: Identifying role relevant competencies in genomic pathways.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Variant interpretation training for the genomics era: Learning outcomes to inform professional competencies and education.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Next-generation nephrology: part 2-mainstreaming genomics in nephrology, a global perspective.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Empowering human research ethics committees to review genomics applications: evaluating the utility of a custom online education resource.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Consultation informs strategies for improving the use of functional evidence in variant classification.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A theory- and empirically informed evaluation framework.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- The Applied Genomics Development Strategy by the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts paves the way for the future development of applied genomics in Croatia.Croatian medical journal · 2024Article
- Pharmacogenomic curriculum in Australian medical schools: a content analysis study.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- Assessing genomics confidence and learning needs in Australian nurses and midwives: an educational program evaluation.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- Teaching graduate research skills in genomics via an integrated 'flipped' journal club program.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2023Article
- Supporting teachers to use genomics as a context in the classroom: an evaluation of learning resources for high school biology.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Preparing Medical Specialists for Genomic Medicine: Continuing Education Should Include Opportunities for Experiential Learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Development of an Evidence-Based, Theory-Informed National Survey of Physician Preparedness for Genomic Medicine and Preferences for Genomics Continuing Education.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted genomic education and training of professionals have been identified as core components of strategies and implementation plans for the use of genomics in health care systems. Education needs to be effective and support the sustained and appropriate use of genomics in health care. Evaluation of education programs to identify effectiveness is challenging. Furthermore, those responsible for development and delivery are not necessarily trained in education and/or evaluation. Program logic models have been used to support the development and evaluation of education programs by articulating a logical explanation as to how a program intends to produce the desired outcomes. These are highly relevant to genomic education programs, but do not appear to have been widely used to date. To assist those developing and evaluating genomic education programs, and as a first step towards enabling identification of effective genomic education approaches, we developed a consensus program logic model for genomic education. We drew on existing literature and a co-design process with 24 international genomic education and evaluation experts to develop the model. The general applicability of the model to the development of programs was tested by program convenors across four diverse settings. Conveners reported on the utility and relevance of the logic model across development, delivery and evaluation. As a whole, their feedback suggests that the model is flexible and adaptive across university award programs, competency development and continuing professional development activities. We discuss this program logic model as a potential best practice mechanism for developing genomic education, and to support development of an evaluation framework and consistent standards to evaluate and report genomic education program outcomes and impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.