Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31781130›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Reference Genome Anchoring of High-Density Markers for Association Mapping and Genomic Prediction in European Winter Wheat.

Olufunmilayo Ladejobi, Ian J Mackay, Jesse Poland, Sebastien Praud, Julian M Hibberd, Alison R Bentley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wheat Omics: Advancements and Opportunities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Analysis of historical selection in winter wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  9. Trends of genetic changes uncovered by Env- and Eigen-GWAS in wheat and barley.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization and Mapping of Spot Blotch inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olufunmilayo LadejobiThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ian J MackayThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jesse PolandWheat Genetics Resource Center, Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Sebastien PraudBiogemma, Site de La Garenne, Chappes, France.
Julian M HibberdDepartment of Plant Sciences, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alison R BentleyThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we anchored genotyping-by-sequencing data to the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium Reference Sequence v1.0 assembly to generate over 40,000 high quality single nucleotide polymorphism markers on a panel of 376 elite European winter wheat varieties released between 1946 and 2007. We compared association mapping and genomic prediction accuracy for a range of productivity traits with previous results based on lower density dominant DArT markers. The results demonstrate that the availability of RefSeq v1.0 supports higher precision trait mapping and provides the density of markers required to obtain accurate predictions of traits controlled by multiple small effect loci, including grain yield.

Indexed as

genomic selectionmappingnext-generation sequencingquantitative traitstrait dissection

Identifiers

PMID31781130
PMCPMC6857554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.