ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2019
Robustness of Radiomics for Survival Prediction of Brain Tumor Patients Depending on Resection Status.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning-based overall survival prediction model in patients with rare cancer: a case study for primary central nervous system lymphoma.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Opportunities and Advances in Radiomics and Radiogenomics for Pediatric Medulloblastoma Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Brain Tumors and Their Habitat: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Non-invasive prediction of overall survival time for glioblastoma multiforme patients based on multimodal MRI radiomics.International journal of imaging systems and technology · 2023Article
- Predicting survival of glioblastoma from automatic whole-brain and tumor segmentation of MR images.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Differentiation of Cerebral Dissecting Aneurysm from Hemorrhagic Saccular Aneurysm by Machine-Learning Based on Vessel Wall MRI: A Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Location-Based Features for Survival Prediction of Patients With Glioblastoma Depending on Resection Status.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Introduction to radiomics and radiogenomics in neuro-oncology: implications and challenges.Neuro-oncology advances · 2020Article
- Radiomic-based prognostic score for survival risk-stratification in pediatric medulloblastoma tumors: A multi-institutional study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediction of overall survival based on multimodal MRI of brain tumor patients is a difficult problem. Although survival also depends on factors that cannot be assessed via preoperative MRI such as surgical outcome, encouraging results for MRI-based survival analysis have been published for different datasets. We assess if and how established radiomic approaches as well as novel methods can predict overall survival of brain tumor patients on the BraTS challenge dataset. This dataset consists of multimodal preoperative images of 211 glioblastoma patients from several institutions with reported resection status and known survival. In the official challenge setting, only patients with a reported gross total resection (GTR) are taken into account. We therefore evaluated previously published methods as well as different machine learning approaches on the BraTS dataset. For different types of resection status, these approaches are compared to a baseline, a linear regression on patient age only. This naive approach won the 3rd place out of 26 participants in the BraTS survival prediction challenge 2018. Previously published radiomic signatures show significant correlations and predictiveness to patient survival for patients with a reported subtotal resection. However, for patients with reported GTR, none of the evaluated approaches was able to outperform the age-only baseline in a cross-validation setting, explaining the poor performance of approaches based on radiomics in the BraTS challenge 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.