Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31780820›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2020

Understanding the retinal basis of vision across species.

Tom Baden, Thomas Euler, Philipp Berens

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ten-Eleven Translocation Enzymes Control the Rate and Mode of Retinal Progenitor Cell Division in the Developing Retina.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Convergent re-evolution of CNS structures: focus on the fovea.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2026
    Review
  14. Foveated Light-Field Compound Imager.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tom BadenSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. t.baden@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2808-4210
Thomas EulerInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp BerensInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-4727

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R014817/1Medical Research Council MC_PC_15071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vertebrate retina first evolved some 500 million years ago in ancestral marine chordates. Since then, the eyes of different species have been tuned to best support their unique visuoecological lifestyles. Visual specializations in eye designs, large-scale inhomogeneities across the retinal surface and local circuit motifs mean that all species' retinas are unique. Computational theories, such as the efficient coding hypothesis, have come a long way towards an explanation of the basic features of retinal organization and function; however, they cannot explain the full extent of retinal diversity within and across species. To build a truly general understanding of vertebrate vision and the retina's computational purpose, it is therefore important to more quantitatively relate different species' retinal functions to their specific natural environments and behavioural requirements. Ultimately, the goal of such efforts should be to build up to a more general theory of vision.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalHumansModels, NeurologicalRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal NeuronsSpecies SpecificityVision, Ocular

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.