Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31780764›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Endoscopic score vs blood cell indices for determining timing of immunomodulator withdrawal in quiescent ulcerative colitis.

Kazuhiro Takenaka, Keiichi Tominaga, Mimari Kanazawa, Koh Fukushi, Takanao Tanaka, Akira Kanamori, Takeshi Sugaya, Kouhei Tsuchida, Makoto Iijima, Kenichi Goda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuhiro TakenakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Keiichi TominagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan. tominaga@dokkyomed.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3716-3386
Mimari KanazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Koh FukushiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Takanao TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Akira KanamoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Takeshi SugayaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Kouhei TsuchidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Makoto IijimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Kenichi GodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Atsushi IrisawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Dokkyo Medical University · JPAshikaga Red Cross Hospital · JPDokkyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While immunomodulators (IMs) are used as key drugs in remission maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), there has been no evidence to date for determining monitoring methods and drug withdrawal. Therefore, we examined if a decrease in white blood cell count (WBC) and an elevation in mean cell volume (MCV) could be used as optimization indices and if mucosal healing (MH) could be a rationale for determining the time of IM withdrawal. Subjects were 89 UC patients who were using IMs and for whom clinical remission had been maintained. Those with a Rachmilewitz Clinical Activity Index score of 4 or lower and those with a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) of 0 or 1 were defined as MH. The remission maintenance rates of the following comparative groups were examined: an IM continuation group and an IM withdrawal group; an IM continuation group with a WBC of less than 3000 or a MCV of 100 or greater and an IM continuation group with a WBC of 3000 or greater and a MCV of 99 or lower; an IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had been achieved and an IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had not been achieved; and an IM withdrawal group with a MES of 0 and an IM withdrawal group with a MES of 1. A significantly higher remission maintenance rate was observed in the IM continuation group compared to the withdrawal group (p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the IM continuation group with a WBC of less than 3000 or a MCV of 100 or greater and the IM continuation group with a WBC of 3000 or greater and a MCV of 99 or lower (p = 0.08). Higher remission maintenance rates were observed in the IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had been achieved compared to the IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had not been achieved (p = 0.03). No significant difference was observed between the IM withdrawal group with MES 0 and the IM withdrawal group with MES 1. (p = 0.48). This retrospective study showed that remission maintenance could be firmly obtained by continuing IM administration in case of endoscopic MH; however, MH was not an indicator of IM withdrawal.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell SizeColitis, UlcerativeColonoscopyFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID31780764
PMCPMC6882869
OpenAlexW2990183307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.