ArticleBMJ open2019
Challenges in making standardisation work in healthcare: lessons from a qualitative interview study of a line-labelling policy in a UK region.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the power of standardization in pediatric neurosurgery.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- A qualitative study of the reimplementation of a standardised paediatric early warning system pilot in England.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Exploring Physicians' Dual Perspectives on the Transition From Free Text to Structured and Standardized Documentation Practices: Interview and Participant Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Article
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study.Age and ageing · 2025Article
- Protocol for a parallel cluster randomized trial of a participatory tailored approach to reduce overuse of antibiotics at hospital discharge: the ROAD home trial.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Design as a quality improvement strategy: The case for design expertise.Future healthcare journal · 2024Article
- Patient Safety and the Question of Dignitary Harms.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2023Article
- Commissioned reports in Swedish healthcare governance - descriptive mapping and a content analysis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Visual identifier systems for patients with cognitive impairment in healthcare settings: A survey of practice in UK hospitals.International journal of older people nursing · 2022Article
- Current methods of nurse-surgeon training and education: Systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2021Review
- Implementation of a central-line bundle: a qualitative study of three clinical units.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Characterising and describing postpartum haemorrhage emergency kits in context: a protocol for a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify and learn from efforts to design and implement a standardised policy for labelling of invasive tubing and lines across a regional health system.
designSingle case study involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis.
settingA devolved health system in the UK National Health Service (NHS).
participantsNHS staff (n=10) and policy-makers (n=8) who were involved in the design and/or implementation of the standardised policy.
resultsThough standardising labelling of invasive tubing and lines was initially seen as a common-sense technical change, challenges during the process of developing and implementing the policy were multiple and sociotechnical in nature. Major challenges related to defining the problem and the solution, limited sustained engagement with stakeholders and users, prototyping/piloting of the solution, and planning for implementation. Some frontline staff remained unconvinced of the need for or value of the policy, since they either did not believe that there was a problem or did not agree that standardised labelling was the right solution. Mundane practical issues such authorisation and resourcing, supply chains for labels, the need to restructure work practices to accommodate the new standard, and the physical features of the labels in specific clinical settings all had important impacts.
conclusionsNewly standardised tools and practices have to fit within a system of pre-existing norms, practices and procedures. We identified a number of practical, social and cultural challenges when designing and implementing a standardised policy in a regional healthcare system. Taking account of both sociocultural and technical aspects of standardisation, combined with systems thinking, could lead to more effective implementation and increase acceptability and usability of new standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.