Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31780523›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2020

Treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in older adults calls for a patient-centred approach.

Emma Ef Kleipool, Johannes An Dorresteijn, Yvo M Smulders, Frank Lj Visseren, Mike Jl Peters, Majon Muller

Open access · hybridFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond Life's Essential 8: optimizing cardiovascular health metrics to predict mortality.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Statin Therapy in Very Old Patients: Lights and Shadows.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Underrepresentation of the elderly in clinical trials, time for action.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma Ef KleipoolInternal medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands e.kleipool@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9518-6797
Johannes An DorresteijnVascular medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yvo M SmuldersInternal medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank Lj VisserenVascular medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-5223
Mike Jl PetersInternal medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Majon MullerInternal medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to an increasing number of older adults with (risk factors for) cardiovascular disease (CVD), the sum of older adults eligible for lipid-lowering drugs will increase. This has risen questions about benefits and harms of lipid-lowering therapy in older adults with a varying number of (cardiovascular) comorbidities and functional status. The heterogeneity in physical and functional health increases with age, leading to a much wider variety in cardiovascular risk and life expectancy than in younger adults. We suggest treatment decisions on hypercholesterolaemia in adults aged ≥75 years should shift from a strictly 10-year cardiovascular risk-driven approach to a patient-centred and lifetime benefit-based approach. With this, estimated 10-year risk of CVD should be placed into the perspective of life expectancy. Moreover, frailty and safety concerns must be taken into account for a risk-benefit discussion between clinician and patient. Based on the Dutch addendum 'Cardiovascular Risk Management in (frail) older adults', our approach offers more detailed information on when not to initiate or deprescribe therapy than standard guidelines. Instead of using traditional risk estimating tools which tend to overestimate risk of CVD in older adults, use a competing risk adjusted, older adults-specific risk score (available at https://u-prevent.com). By filling in a patient's (cardiovascular) health profile (eg, cholesterol, renal function), the tool estimates risk of CVD and models the effect of medication in terms of absolute risk reduction for an individual patient. Using this tool can guide doctors and patients in making shared decisions on initiating, continuing or deprescribing lipid-lowering therapy.

Indexed as

Life ExpectancyPatient-Centered CareAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Decision-MakingDeprescriptionsFrailtyHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaRisk AssessmentAnticholesteremic AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscardiovascular diseasefrailtylipid-lowering drugsolder adults

Identifiers

PMID31780523
PMCPMC7027025
OpenAlexW2991390173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.