Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31780248›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2020

Bridging Motor and Cognitive Control: It's About Time!

Harrison Ritz, Romy Frömer, Amitai Shenhav

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harrison RitzBrown University, 190 Thayer Street, Box 1821, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Romy FrömerBrown University, 190 Thayer Street, Box 1821, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Amitai ShenhavBrown University, 190 Thayer Street, Box 1821, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Electronic address: amitai_shenhav@brown.edu.

Funding

The neural basis of sequential control in human and non-human primatesP20GM103645 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WORDEN, MICHAEL S · 2013 to 2022
$22.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is how we control our thoughts similar to how we control our movements? Egger et al. show that the neural dynamics underlying the control of internal states exhibit similar algorithmic properties as those that control movements. This experiment reveals a promising connection between how we control our brain and our body.

Indexed as

BrainMovementCognitionHumanscognitive controlmotor controlneural dynamicspredictive coding

Identifiers

PMID31780248
PMCPMC6989175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.