ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020
The effects of upper airway tissue motion on airflow dynamics.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological parameters for upper airway assessment by cone-beam computed tomography in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Inhalation Airflow Dynamics in a Human Pharyngeal Airway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The human upper airway is not only geometrically complex, but it can also deform dynamically as a result of active muscle contraction and motility during respiration. How the active transformation of the airway geometry affects airflow dynamics during respiration is not well understood despite the importance of this knowledge towards improving current understanding of particle transport and deposition. In this study, particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) measurements of the fluid dynamics are presented in a physiologically realistic human upper airway replica for (i) the undeformed case and (ii) the case where realistic soft tissue motion during breathing is emulated. Results from this study show that extrathoracic wall motion alters the flow field significantly such that the fluid dynamics is distinctly different from the undeformed airway. Distinctive flow field patterns in the physiologically realistic airway include (i) fluid recirculation at the back of the tongue and cranial to the tip of the epiglottis during mid-inspiration, (ii) horizontal and posteriorly directed flow at the back of tongue at the peak of inspiration and (iii) a more homogeneous flow across the airway downstream from the epiglottis. These findings suggest that the active deformation of the human upper airway may potentially influence particle transport and deposition at the back of the tongue and therefore, highlights the importance of considering extrathoracic wall motion in future airway flow studies. D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.