ArticleIndian heart journal
Evaluation of intracoronary blood from obstructive vessel in patients of ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PPCI.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInformation available on acid-base imbalance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) submitted to primary percutaneous intervention is limited and no data were present on intracoronary blood analysis, extracted from obstructed artery.
methodsThis was a prospective study conducted over 12 months in which STEMI patients presenting in emergency and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were included. Blood gas analysis of intracoronary arterial blood from obstructed vessel and peripheral arterial blood was performed. Patients in whom adequate intracoronary sample could not be obtained were excluded. Intracoronary and peripheral arterial blood gas measurements were correlated and relationship of intracoronary parameters were compared with clinical parameters, investigational markers and short-term outcome.
resultsThe mean age of study population was 54.8 years and average symptom onset to door time was 162 min. On comparing intracoronary blood with peripheral blood arterial obtained, pH (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.01 to 0.02;p = 0.44), lactate (95% CI 0.03-0.1;p = 0.28), bicarbonate (95% CI 0.6-1.5;p = 0.64), pCO
conclusionThe evaluation of intracoronary blood provides no additional information regarding the prognosis and short-term (30-day) outcome of the patients when compared with peripheral blood. However, there was a significant intracoronary hyperlactatemia in patients presenting late after symptom onset. SBP was also significantly less in patients with high intracoronary lactate, which signifies that predominant cause of hyperlactatemia was systemic hypoperfusion rather than local increase in lactate levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.