Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31779699›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Chimney Trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck, Heikki Wiik, Jyrki Kössi, Maziar Nikberg, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03799939 (Chimney Trial - Randomized, Controlled, Multi Center Trial of Parastomal Hernia Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03799939 naunknown statusnot on this map

Chimney Trial - Randomized, Controlled, Multi Center Trial of Parastomal Hernia Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OuluRan2019 to 2026Enrolled141ConditionsParastomal Hernia, Rectal Adenocarcinoma, Abdominoperineal ResectionArmsIntervention group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. When to use a prophylactic mesh after stoma closure: a case-control study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisa Mäkäräinen-UhlbäckOulu University Hospital, PL 21, 90029, OYS, Finland. elisa.makarainen-uhlback@ppshp.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4408-2514
Heikki WiikOulu University Hospital, PL 21, 90029, OYS, Finland.
Jyrki KössiPäijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7, 15850, Lahti, Finland.
Maziar NikbergVästmanlands Hospital Västerås, 721 89, Västerås, Sweden.
Pasi OhtonenOulu University Hospital, PL 21, 90029, OYS, Finland.
Tero RautioOulu University Hospital, PL 21, 90029, OYS, Finland.

Funding

Thelma Mäkikyrö Foundation 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParastomal hernias (PSHs) are common, troubling the lives of people with permanent colostomy. In previous studies, retromuscular keyhole mesh placement has been the most-used technique for PSH prevention but results have been controversial. Additionally, surgical treatment of PSHs is associated with a high rate of complications and recurrences. Therefore, it is crucial to find the most effective way to prevent PSHs in the first place without an increased risk of complications. Due to a lack of adequate research, there is no clear evidence or recommendations on which mesh or technique is best to prevent PSHs. METHODS/

designThe Chimney Trial is a Nordic, prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter trial designed to compare the feasibility and the potential benefits of specifically designed, intra-abdominal onlay mesh (DynaMesh®-Parastomal, FEG Textiltechnik GmbH, Aachen, Germany) against controls with permanent colostomy without mesh. The primary outcome of the Chimney Trial is the incidence of a PSH detected by a computerized tomography (CT) scan at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are the rate of clinically detected PSHs, surgical-site infection as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), complications as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification, the reoperation rate, operative time, length of stay, quality of life as measured by the RAND-36 survey and colostomy impact score, and both direct and indirect costs. For each group, 102 patients were enrolled at attending hospitals and randomized at a ratio of 1:1 by browser-based software to receive a preventive mesh or a conventional colostomy without a mesh. Patients will be followed for 1 month and at 1, 3, and 5 years after the operation for long-term results and complications. DISCUSSION: The Chimney Trial aims to provide level-I evidence on PSH prevention.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03799939. Registered on 10 January 2019.

Indexed as

ColostomyHernia, AbdominalRectal NeoplasmsSurgical MeshHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSingle-Blind MethodAbdominoperineal resectionParastomal hernia preventionRectal cancer treatment

Identifiers

PMID31779699
PMCPMC6883681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.