ArticleClinical epigenetics2019
Combined genetic mutations and DNA-methylated genes as biomarkers for endometrial cancer detection from cervical scrapings.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cervicovaginal specimen biomarkers for early detection of ovarian and endometrial cancer: A review.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of CDO1 and ZSCAN12 methylation in endometrial versus cervical samples for endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a comparative study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Analytical and clinical validation of the EdenDx methylation assay as a noninvasive supportive triage tool for early detection of endometrial cancer in cervical scraping specimens.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Integrating epigenetic and metabolic indicators for non-invasive endometrial cancer triage: a machine learning approach.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Systematic Multiplatform Discovery of Methylation Markers Enables Non-Invasive Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Human papilloma virus (HPV) mediated cancers: an insightful update.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Present progress in biomarker discovery of endometrial cancer by multi-omics approaches.Clinical proteomics · 2025Review
- The morphological characteristics and arrangements of cells in the liquid-based cytology preparation of patients with endometrial lesions.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Research Progress of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- Advancements in Minimally Invasive Techniques and Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Diagnostic Approaches and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Minimally Invasive and Emerging Diagnostic Approaches in Endometrial Cancer: Epigenetic Insights and the Promise of DNA Methylation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Multicenter Cohort Study on DNA Methylation for Endometrial Cancer Detection in Cervical Scrapings.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Unveiling DNA methylation: early diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapy for endometrial cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The endometrial cancer detection using non-invasive hypermethylation ofCytoJournal · 2024Article
- Research progress and applications of epigenetic biomarkers in cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- SIM2: Its Prognostic Significance and Oncogenic Role in Endometrial Carcinoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Article
- Flavone-based dual PARP-Tubulin inhibitor manifesting efficacy against endometrial cancer.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Regulation of HAND2 Expression by LncRNAJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023Article
- Cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1): Its functional role in physiological and pathophysiological processes.Genes & diseases · 2023Review
- Minimally invasive approaches for the early detection of endometrial cancer.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial cancer is a common gynecologic cancer. Noninvasive molecular biomarkers for triage of high-risk patients for invasive procedures are needed. Based on the success of cytological Pap smear screening, cervical scrapings are a good source of DNA for molecular testing. In addition to genetic lesions, DNA methylation is a promising biomarker. We assessed the usefulness of combining genetic and epigenetic biomarkers from cervical scrapings to detect endometrial carcinomas.
methodsWe performed a retrospective case-control study of 96 consecutive cervical scrapings from patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who underwent surgery for diagnostic evaluation. Thirty and 16 cases were diagnosed with type I and type II endometrial cancers, respectively. The remaining non-cancer cases included normal endometrium (n = 12), benign uterine lesions (n = 20), and endometrial hyperplasia (n = 18). Quantitative methylation-specific PCR and mass spectrometry were used for DNA methylation and genetic mutation analysis. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the clinical performance of these candidate biomarkers.
resultsWe tested the effectiveness of the methylation status of four genes (BHLHE22, CDO1, TBX5, and HAND2) in endometrial cancer detection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranged from 0.703 to 0.878, and panels of hypermethylated BHLHE22/CDO1/HAND2 (87.0% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity) and BHLHE22/CDO1/TBX5 (89.1% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity) showed significant differences and could distinguish benign from malignant endometrial lesions. The sensitivity and specificity in endometrial cancer detection for BHLHE22/CDO1 were 84.8% and 88.0%, respectively. Both type I and II endometrial carcinomas could be detected using a BHLHE22/CDO1-based methylation profile, suggesting that they may have common epigenomes. Moreover, PTEN and TP53 mutations were found in 63.3% of type I and 93.6% of type II endometrial cancers. Unexpectedly, PTEN and TP53 mutations were commonly found in cervical scrapings of the normal endometrium (25% and 33.3%, respectively) and in cases with benign uterine lesions (10% and 50%, respectively). Finally, combinations of any one mutation of PTEN and TP53 mutations had a sensitivity of 91.3%, but a specificity of only 42.0%.
conclusionsAdding PTEN/TP53 mutation testing to BHLHE22/CDO1-based methylation testing did not improve the detection of endometrial cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.