Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31779673›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2019

Osteogenic commitment of Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stromal cells: mechanisms and implications for bioprocess development and clinical application.

Raquel Cabrera-Pérez, Marta Monguió-Tortajada, Ana Gámez-Valero, Raquel Rojas-Márquez, Francesc Enric Borràs, Santiago Roura, Joaquim Vives

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying Biomarkers for Osteogenic Potency Assay Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Potency Assays: The 'Bugaboo' of Stem Cell Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells-from bench to bedside.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Raquel Cabrera-PérezCell Therapy Service, Blood and Tissue Bank (BST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. rcabrera@bst.cat.
Marta Monguió-TortajadaREMAR-IVECAT Group, Health Science Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ana Gámez-ValeroREMAR-IVECAT Group, Health Science Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
Raquel Rojas-MárquezCell Therapy Service, Blood and Tissue Bank (BST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Francesc Enric BorràsREMAR-IVECAT Group, Health Science Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
Santiago RouraICREC Research Program, Health Science Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
Joaquim VivesCell Therapy Service, Blood and Tissue Bank (BST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. jvives@bst.cat.ORCID 0000-0001-9719-5235
Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol · ESCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthopaedic diseases are one of the major targets for regenerative medicine. In this context, Wharton's jelly (WJ) is an alternative source to bone marrow (BM) for allogeneic transplantation since its isolation does not require an invasive procedure for cell collection and does not raise major ethical concerns. However, the osteogenic capacity of human WJ-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) remains unclear.

methodsHere, we compared the baseline osteogenic potential of MSC from WJ and BM cell sources by cytological staining, quantitative real-time PCR and proteomic analysis, and assessed chemical and biological strategies for priming undifferentiated WJ-MSC. Concretely, different inhibitors/activators of the TGFβ1-BMP2 signalling pathway as well as the secretome of differentiating BM-MSC were tested.

resultsCytochemical staining as well as gene expression and proteomic analysis revealed that osteogenic commitment was poor in WJ-MSC. However, stimulation of the BMP2 pathway with BMP2 plus tanshinone IIA and the addition of extracellular vesicles or protein-enriched preparations from differentiating BM-MSC enhanced WJ-MSC osteogenesis. Furthermore, greater outcome was obtained with the use of conditioned media from differentiating BM-MSC.

conclusionsAltogether, our results point to the use of master banks of WJ-MSC as a valuable alternative to BM-MSC for orthopaedic conditions.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationOsteogenesisBone Marrow CellsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Culture Media, ConditionedHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsProteomicsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBMP2 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Culture Media, ConditionedBone marrowBone regenerationMesenchymal stromal cellsOsteogenic differentiationWharton’s jelly

Identifiers

PMID31779673
PMCPMC6883559
OpenAlexW2989970941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.