Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31779636›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

A few ethical issues in translational research for gene and cell therapy.

Luciana Riva, Carlo Petrini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bioethics of somatic gene therapy: what do we know so far?Current medical research and opinion · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A Survey to Assess the Knowledge and Perceptions about Gene Therapy in Indian Haemophilia Patients.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Engineering signalling pathways in mammalian cells.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Updating the ethical guidance for gene and cell therapy research participation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Genome Editing for Rare Diseases.Current stem cell reports · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luciana RivaBioethics Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162, Rome, Italy. luciana.riva@iss.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1695-3183
Carlo PetriniBioethics Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health), Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162, Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough translational research for drug development can provide patients with valuable therapeutic resources it is not without risk, especially in the early-phase trials that present the highest degree of uncertainty. With the extraordinary evolution of biomedical technologies, a growing number of innovative products based on human cells and gene therapy are being tested and used as drugs. Their use on humans poses several challenges.

methodsIn this work, we discuss some ethical issues related to gene and cell therapies translational research. We focus on early-phase studies analysing the regulatory approach of Europe and the United States. We report the current recommendations and guidelines of international scientific societies and European and American regulatory authorities.

resultsThe peculiarity of human cell- or tissue-based products and gene therapy has required the development of specific regulatory tools that must be continually updated in line with the progress of the research. The ethics of translational research for these products also requires further considerations, particularly with respect to the specificity of the associated risk profiles.

conclusionsAn integrated ethical approach that aims for transparency and regulation of development processes, the support of independent judgment in clinical trials and the elimination of unregulated and uncontrolled grey areas of action are necessary to move gene and cell therapy forward.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyClinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyHumansSocial Control, FormalTranslational Research, BiomedicalCellular and gene therapyFirst in human trialsResearch ethicsTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID31779636
PMCPMC6883654
OpenAlexW2990380036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.