Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31779150›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2019

The Prevalence of Legal Performance-Enhancing Substance Use and Potential Cognitive and or Physical Doping in German Recreational Triathletes, Assessed via the Randomised Response Technique.

Sebastian Seifarth, Pavel Dietz, Alexander C Disch, Martin Engelhardt, Stefan Zwingenberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Analgesic Use in Sports.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. [Doping in recreational sports].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Painkiller use in amateur football: high prevalence, but limited misuse.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian SeifarthDepartment of Sports Medicine at the University Center for Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Pavel DietzInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Centre of the University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8390-0594
Alexander C DischDepartment of Sports Medicine at the University Center for Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Martin EngelhardtDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
Stefan ZwingenbergerDepartment of Sports Medicine at the University Center for Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinikum Osnabrück · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the use of performance-enhancing substances in recreational triathletes who were competing in German races at distances ranging from super-sprint to long-distance, as per the International Triathlon Union. The use of legal drugs and over-the-counter supplements over the previous year, painkillers over the previous 3 months, and the potential three-month prevalence of physical doping and or cognitive doping in this group were assessed via an anonymous questionnaire. The Randomised Response Technique (RRT) was implemented for sensitive questions regarding "prescription drugs […] for the purpose of performance enhancement […] only available at a pharmacy or on the black market". The survey did not directly state the word "doping," but included examples of substances that could later be classed as physical and or cognitive doping. The subjects were not required to detail what they were taking. Overall, 1953 completed questionnaires were received from 3134 registered starters at six regional events-themselves involving 17 separate races-in 2017. Of the respondents, 31.8% and 11.3% admitted to the use of dietary supplements, and of painkillers during the previous three months, respectively. Potential physical doping and cognitive doping over the preceding year were reported by 7.0% (Confidence Interval CI: 4.2-9.8) and 9.4% (CI: 6.6-12.3) of triathletes. Gender, age, experience in endurance sports, and number of weekly triathlon training hours were linked to potential physical or cognitive doping. Given the potentially relevant side effects of painkiller use and physical and or cognitive doping, we recommend that educational and preventative measures for them be implemented within amateur triathlons.

Indexed as

dopingpainkillersrecreational athletesrisk factorsRRTtriathlon

Identifiers

PMID31779150
PMCPMC6956052
OpenAlexW2990806279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.