Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31779126›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Nasal Drug Delivery of Anticancer Drugs for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: Preclinical and Clinical Trials.

Franciele Aline Bruinsmann, Gustavo Richter Vaz, Aline de Cristo Soares Alves, Tanira Aguirre, Adriana Raffin Pohlmann, Silvia Stanisçuaski Guterres, Fabio Sonvico

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic cell-based vaccines for glioblastoma multiforme.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franciele Aline BruinsmannPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90610-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-7542
Gustavo Richter VazFood and Drug Department, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 27/a, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-801X
Aline de Cristo Soares AlvesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90610-000, Brazil.
Tanira AguirrePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biociências, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS 900500-170, Brazil.
Adriana Raffin PohlmannPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90610-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5222-1807
Silvia Stanisçuaski GuterresPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90610-000, Brazil.
Fabio SonvicoFood and Drug Department, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 27/a, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7372-1456

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465687/2014-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico BOLSA PESQUISADOR VISITANTE ESPECIAL-PVE 401196/2014-3Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior PDSE - 88881.189309/2018-01Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/50928-2PRONEX FAPERGS/CNPq 12/2014 16/2551-0000467-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal form of brain tumor, being characterized by the rapid growth and invasion of the surrounding tissue. The current standard treatment for glioblastoma is surgery, followed by radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy, typically with temozolomide. Although extensive research has been carried out over the past years to develop a more effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of GBM, efforts have not provided major improvements in terms of the overall survival of patients. Consequently, new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Overcoming the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a major challenge in the development of therapies for central nervous system (CNS) disorders. In this context, the intranasal route of drug administration has been proposed as a non-invasive alternative route for directly targeting the CNS. This route of drug administration bypasses the BBB and reduces the systemic side effects. Recently, several formulations have been developed for further enhancing nose-to-brain transport, mainly with the use of nano-sized and nanostructured drug delivery systems. The focus of this review is to provide an overview of the strategies that have been developed for delivering anticancer compounds for the treatment of GBM while using nasal administration. In particular, the specific properties of nanomedicines proposed for nose-to-brain delivery will be critically evaluated. The preclinical and clinical data considered supporting the idea that nasal delivery of anticancer drugs may represent a breakthrough advancement in the fight against GBM.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainBrain NeoplasmsDrug Delivery SystemsGlioblastomaHumansNasal MucosaAntineoplastic Agentsclinical evaluationdrug deliveryglioblastoma multiformenanoparticlesnasal deliverynose-to-brain deliverypre-clinical studies

Identifiers

PMID31779126
PMCPMC6930669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.