ArticleJournal of neural engineering2019
Short reaction times in response to multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation may provide a basis for rapid movement-related feedback.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term safety and efficacy of intracortical microstimulation in humans.Science translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Evoking stable and precise tactile sensations via multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Towards Precise Synthetic Neural Codes: High-dimensional Stimulation with Flexible Electrodes.Npj flexible electronics · 2025Article
- Utilization of peripheral nerve feedback at a preconscious level.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Decoding hand kinetics and kinematics using somatosensory cortex activity in active and passive movement.iScience · 2023Article
- Tessellation of artificial touch via microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Biomimetic multi-channel microstimulation of somatosensory cortex conveys high resolution force feedback for bionic hands.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Characterizing the short-latency evoked response to intracortical microstimulation across a multi-electrode array.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.Physiological reviews · 2022Review
- Similarities Between Somatosensory Cortical Responses InducedFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Subthreshold intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex enhances tactile sensitivity.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTetraplegic patients using brain-machine interfaces can make visually guided reaches with robotic arms. However, restoring proprioceptive feedback to these patients will be critical, as evidenced by the movement deficit in patients with proprioceptive loss. Proprioception is critical in large part because it provides faster feedback than vision. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a promising approach, but the ICMS-evoked reaction time (RT) is typically slower than that to natural proprioceptive and often even visual cues, implying that ICMS feedback may not be fast enough to guide movement. APPROACH: For most sensory modalities, RT decreases with increased stimulus intensity. Thus, it may be that stimulation intensities beyond what has previously been used will result in faster RTs. To test this, we compared the RT to ICMS applied through multi-electrode arrays in area 2 of somatosensory cortex to that of mechanical and visual cues. MAIN
resultsWe found that the RT to single-electrode ICMS decreased with increased current, frequency, and train length. For 100 µA, 330 Hz stimulation, the highest single-electrode intensity we tested routinely, most electrodes resulted in RTs slower than the mechanical cue but slightly faster than the visual cue. While increasing the current beyond 100 µA resulted in faster RTs, sustained stimulation at this level may damage tissue. Alternatively, by stimulating through multiple electrodes (mICMS), a large amount of current can be injected while keeping that through each electrode at a safe level. We found that stimulation with at least 480 µA equally distributed over 16 electrodes could produce RTs as much as 20 ms faster than the mechanical cue, roughly the conduction delay to cortex from the periphery. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that mICMS may provide a means to supply rapid, movement-related feedback. Future neuroprosthetics may need spatiotemporally patterned mICMS to convey useful somatosensory information. Novelty & Significance Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a promising approach for providing artificial somatosensation to patients with spinal cord injury or limb amputation, but in prior experiments, subjects have been unable to respond as quickly to it as to natural cues. We have investigated the use of multi-electrode stimulation (mICMS) and discovered that it can produce reaction times as fast or faster even than natural mechanical cues. Although our stimulus trains were not modulated in time, this result opens the door to more complex spatiotemporal patterns of mICMS that might be used to rapidly write in complex somatosensory information to the CNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.