ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2019
Increasing Divergence in Drug Prices Between the United States and Germany After Implementation of Comparative Effectiveness Analysis and Collective Price Negotiations.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of the United States most favored nation policies on prices of branded medicines and research and development.Health policy OPEN · 2026Review
- Price determinants and pricing policies concerning potentially innovative health technologies: a scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Utilization and Determinants of Anticancer Drugs Under China's National Drug Price Negotiation Policy.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Article
- The impact of government reimbursement negotiation on targeted anticancer medicines use and cost in China: A cohort study based on national health insurance data.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- How National Health Insurance Coverage Policy Affected the Use of Trastuzumab and Rituximab in China: A Bicentric Retrospective Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Impact of the national drug price negotiation policy on the utilization, cost, and accessibility of anticancer medicines in China: A controlled interrupted time series study.Journal of global health · 2022Article
- The impacts of government reimbursement negotiation on targeted anticancer medication price, volume and spending in China.BMJ global health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPayers and purchasers in the United States seek to moderate drug prices and align them with the incremental clinical benefit offered by individual medications; some policymakers have proposed linking U.S. prices to an index of prices paid in other nations. The German health care system resembles that of the United States in featuring multiple private payers but differs in featuring a highly coordinated process of comparative clinical assessment and price negotiations for drugs.
objectivesTo (a) measure trends in prices paid for physician-administered drugs in Germany before and after the mandate for comparative effectiveness assessment and price negotiations in 2011 and (b) compare them with price trends for the same drugs in the United States.
methodsThis study observed trends in the prices paid for 80 physician-administered drugs, which account for approximately half of Medicare Part B drug spending. Quarterly data covering 2004-2018 were obtained for Germany from the Lauer-Taxe database, which contains net prices paid by all German payers. U.S. data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which publishes net prices paid by private U.S. payers and the Medicare Part B program. These data contain the net prices actually paid after accounting for all discounts and rebates, not merely the manufacturer's list price. Statistical analyses were conducted with multivariable difference-in-differences regression methods.
resultsBefore implementation in Germany of comparative effectiveness analysis and collective price negotiations, net U.S. prices for physician-administered drugs averaged 29.2% higher (95% CI = 26.6%-31.7) than those in Germany. After implementation of comparative effectiveness assessments and price negotiations in 2011, the divergence between U.S. and German prices increased another 28.9% (95% CI = 23.7%-34.3%).
conclusionsCommercial health insurers and Medicare pay significantly higher net prices for physician-administered drugs than do insurers in Germany, with the divergence growing after the mandate in Germany that new drugs be subject to comparative effectiveness assessment and collective price negotiations. The experience of Germany may be of special value for the current U.S. debate over pharmaceutical pricing reform, given the demographic, economic, and health system similarities between the 2 nations. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Commonwealth Fund, New York. The sponsor had no role in the study design, conduct, interpretation, or writing up of results. Whaley reports a grant from the National Institute on Aging, unrelated to this work. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.