Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31778624›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2019

Increasing Divergence in Drug Prices Between the United States and Germany After Implementation of Comparative Effectiveness Analysis and Collective Price Negotiations.

Fabian Berkemeier, Christopher Whaley, James C Robinson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Price determinants and pricing policies concerning potentially innovative health technologies: a scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabian BerkemeierBerlin University of Technology, IGES Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Christopher WhaleyRAND Corporation, University of California, Berkeley.
James C RobinsonSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPayers and purchasers in the United States seek to moderate drug prices and align them with the incremental clinical benefit offered by individual medications; some policymakers have proposed linking U.S. prices to an index of prices paid in other nations. The German health care system resembles that of the United States in featuring multiple private payers but differs in featuring a highly coordinated process of comparative clinical assessment and price negotiations for drugs.

objectivesTo (a) measure trends in prices paid for physician-administered drugs in Germany before and after the mandate for comparative effectiveness assessment and price negotiations in 2011 and (b) compare them with price trends for the same drugs in the United States.

methodsThis study observed trends in the prices paid for 80 physician-administered drugs, which account for approximately half of Medicare Part B drug spending. Quarterly data covering 2004-2018 were obtained for Germany from the Lauer-Taxe database, which contains net prices paid by all German payers. U.S. data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which publishes net prices paid by private U.S. payers and the Medicare Part B program. These data contain the net prices actually paid after accounting for all discounts and rebates, not merely the manufacturer's list price. Statistical analyses were conducted with multivariable difference-in-differences regression methods.

resultsBefore implementation in Germany of comparative effectiveness analysis and collective price negotiations, net U.S. prices for physician-administered drugs averaged 29.2% higher (95% CI = 26.6%-31.7) than those in Germany. After implementation of comparative effectiveness assessments and price negotiations in 2011, the divergence between U.S. and German prices increased another 28.9% (95% CI = 23.7%-34.3%).

conclusionsCommercial health insurers and Medicare pay significantly higher net prices for physician-administered drugs than do insurers in Germany, with the divergence growing after the mandate in Germany that new drugs be subject to comparative effectiveness assessment and collective price negotiations. The experience of Germany may be of special value for the current U.S. debate over pharmaceutical pricing reform, given the demographic, economic, and health system similarities between the 2 nations. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Commonwealth Fund, New York. The sponsor had no role in the study design, conduct, interpretation, or writing up of results. Whaley reports a grant from the National Institute on Aging, unrelated to this work. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to report.

Indexed as

CommerceCosts and Cost AnalysisDrug CostsDrug IndustryEconomic CompetitionGermanyHealth ExpendituresHumansInsurance, HealthInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMedicareNegotiatingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31778624
PMCPMC10397913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.