Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31778436›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2019

Effect of laser treatment on postural control parameters in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

J Taradaj, K Rajfur, J Rajfur, K Ptaszkowski, L Ptaszkowska, M Sopel, J Rosińczuk, R Dymarek

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J TaradajInstitute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-5832
K RajfurFaculty of Physiotherapy, Opole Medical School, Opole, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-6869
J RajfurFaculty of Physiotherapy, Opole Medical School, Opole, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-1301
K PtaszkowskiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5690-5226
L PtaszkowskaFaculty of Physiotherapy, Opole Medical School, Opole, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7706-0971
M SopelDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-2423
J RosińczukDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-2287
R DymarekDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-1775
Wroclaw Medical University · PLPublic Higher Medical Professional School in Opole · PLUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of nonspecific lumbar pain (NSLP) using laser irradiation remains controversial. A systematic review of recently published studies indicates that the effects of laser therapy are commonly assessed using only imperfect methods in terms of measurement error. The main objective of this study was to assess static postural stability using an objective tool in patients with chronic NSLP after laser irradiation at different doses and wavelengths. In total, 68 patients were included in the laser sessions and were randomly assigned into four groups: high-intensity laser therapy at 1064 nm and 60 J/cm2 for 10 min (HILT), sham (HILT placebo), low-level laser therapy at 785 nm and 8 J/cm2 for 8 min (LLLT), and sham (LLLT placebo). In addition, all patients were supplemented with physical exercises (standard stabilization training). To assess postural stability, a double-plate stabilometric platform was used. All measurements were performed pre- and post-laser sessions (three weeks) and at follow-up time points (one and three months). Laser procedures led to more balanced posture stability in patients, although these positive changes were significant mainly for short-term observation (after 4-week therapy). In the follow-up analysis, the parameters were gradually impaired. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA) for independent variables did not show any difference between the studied groups. Low- and high-intensity laser therapy does not lead to a significant improvement in postural sway in patients with NSLP compared with standard stabilization training based on short- and long-term observations.

Indexed as

AdultChronic DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaser TherapyLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostural BalanceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31778436
PMCPMC6886387
OpenAlexW2991310858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.