Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31778273›Full record

ArticleCancer science2020

Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 expression is a predictor in patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

Yukiyasu Okamura, Satoru Yasukawa, Hiroto Narimatsu, Narikazu Boku, Akira Fukutomi, Masaru Konishi, Soichiro Morinaga, Hirochika Toyama, Yuji Kaneoka, Yasuhiro Shimizu and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Yukiyasu OkamuraDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3384-2709
Satoru YasukawaPathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroto NarimatsuCancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-4911
Narikazu BokuGastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira FukutomiGastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masaru KonishiHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Soichiro MorinagaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Hirochika ToyamaHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Yuji KaneokaSurgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShimizuGastrointestinal Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Shoji NakamoriSurgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Naohiro SataGastrointestinal Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Keisuke YamakitaDivision of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Amane TakahashiGastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Osamu KainumaGastrointestinal Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Shoichi HishinumaSurgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Ryuzo YamaguchiSurgery, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Japan.
Masato NaginoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate of School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoGastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Akio YanagisawaPathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Keita MoriClinical Trial Coordination Office Biostatistician, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Katsuhiko UesakaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPAsahikawa Medical University · JPChiba Cancer Center · JPHokkaido University · JPJichi Medical University · JPKasugai Municipal Hospital · JPKobe University · JPNagoya University · JPOgaki Municipal Hospital · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPTochigi Cancer Center · JP

Funding

Daiwa Securities Health FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 26870919 and 17H04288Taiho PharmaceuticalTakeda Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) and the low expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are reported to predict a favorable prognosis in patients treated with gemcitabine (GEM) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as the adjuvant setting, respectively. The expression of hENT1 and DPD were analyzed in patients registered in the JASPAC 01 trial, which showed a better survival of S-1 over GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for pancreatic cancer, and their possible roles for predicting treatment outcomes and selecting a chemotherapeutic agent were investigated. Intensity of hENT1 and DPD expression was categorized into no, weak, moderate or strong by immunohistochemistry staining, and the patients were classified into high (strong/moderate) and low (no/weak) groups. Specimens were available for 326 of 377 (86.5%) patients. High expression of hENT1 and DPD was detected in 100 (30.7%) and 63 (19.3%) of 326 patients, respectively. In the S-1 arm, the median overall survival (OS) with low hENT1, 58.0 months, was significantly better than that with high hENT1, 30.9 months (hazard ratio 1.75, P = 0.007). In contrast, there were no significant differences in OS between DPD low and high groups in the S-1 arm and neither the expression levels of hENT1 nor DPD revealed a relationship with treatment outcomes in the GEM arm. The present study did not show that the DPD and hENT1 are useful biomarkers for choosing S-1 or GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy. However, hENT1 expression is a significant prognostic factor for survival in the S-1 arm.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Drug CombinationsEquilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1FemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxonic AcidAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Drug CombinationsEquilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1Oxonic AcidS 1 (combination)SLC29A1 protein, humanTegafurbiomarkerdihydropyrimidine dehydrogenasehuman equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1JASPAC 01pancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID31778273
PMCPMC7004513
OpenAlexW2991639349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.