Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31778267›Full record

ArticleCancer science2020

Phase 1 study of capmatinib in MET-positive solid tumor patients: Dose escalation and expansion of selected cohorts.

Yung-Jue Bang, Wu-Chou Su, Martin Schuler, Do-Hyun Nam, Wan Teck Lim, Todd M Bauer, Analia Azaro, Ronnie Tung Ping Poon, David Hong, Chia-Chi Lin and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. MET Oncogene Targeting for Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. AberrantCells · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yung-Jue BangSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-4597
Wu-Chou SuNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Martin SchulerDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Do-Hyun NamSamsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Wan Teck LimNational Cancer Centre, Singapore.
Todd M BauerSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Analia AzaroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Molecular Therapeutics Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Ronnie Tung Ping PoonQueen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
David HongUniversity of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chia-Chi LinNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2573-5789
Mikhail AkimovNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Samson GhebremariamNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Sylvia ZhaoChina Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Shanghai, China.
Monica GiovanniniNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Brigette MaState Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Phase 1 Clinical Trial Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capmatinib is an oral, ATP-competitive, and highly potent, type 1b MET inhibitor. Herein, we report phase 1 dose-escalation results for capmatinib in advanced MET-positive solid tumor patients and dose expansion in advanced non-lung tumors. Capmatinib was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile across all explored doses. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred at 200 mg twice daily (bid), 250 mg bid, and 450 mg bid capsules; however, no DLT were reported at 600 mg bid (capsules). Capmatinib tablets at 400 mg bid had comparable tolerability and exposure to that of 600 mg bid capsules. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; recommended phase 2 dose was 400 mg bid tablets/600 mg bid capsules; at this dose, C

Indexed as

AgedBenzamidesCapsulesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasmsPhosphorylationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metTabletsTreatment OutcomeTriazinesBenzamidescapmatinibCapsulesImidazolesMET protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metTabletsTriazinescapmatinibMET amplificationMET dysregulationphase 1solid tumors

Identifiers

PMID31778267
PMCPMC7004521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.