Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777831›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2019

Type I Interferon Predicts an Alternate Immune System Phenotype in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Uma Thanarajasingam, Anoohya N Muppirala, Mark A Jensen, Yogita Ghodke-Puranik, Jessica M Dorschner, Danielle M Vsetecka, Shreyasee Amin, Ashima Makol, Floranne Ernste, Thomas Osborn and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Type I Interferons in Autoimmunity.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Type I interferon antagonists in clinical development for lupus.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Uma ThanarajasingamMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Anoohya N MuppiralaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mark A JensenNew York University School of Medicine.
Yogita Ghodke-PuranikNew York University School of Medicine.
Jessica M DorschnerMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Danielle M VseteckaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shreyasee AminMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ashima MakolMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Floranne ErnsteMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Thomas OsbornMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kevin ModerMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Vaidehi ChowdharyMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Timothy B NiewoldNew York University School of Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-6660
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveType I interferon (IFN) is important to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis, but it is not clear how chronic elevations in IFN alter immune function. We compared cytokine responses after whole blood stimulation with Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists in high- and low-IFN SLE patient subgroups.

methodsSLE patients and nonautoimmune controls were recruited, and SLE patients were categorized as either high or low IFN. Whole blood was dispensed into tubes coated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), oligonucleotides with cytosine-guanine repeats, Resiquimod, IFN-α, and IFN-α + LPS. Cytokine production in patient sera and after whole blood TLR stimulation was measured by multiplex assay, and type I IFN was assessed using a functional assay.

resultsCirculating plasmacytoid dendritic cell numbers were specifically reduced in high-IFN SLE patients and not in low-IFN SLE patients. In serum, we observed that the correlations between cytokines in serum differed to a much greater degree between the high- and low-IFN groups (

conclusionWe find striking differences in resting and stimulated cytokine patterns in high- vs. low-IFN SLE patients, which supports the biological importance of these patient subsets. These data could inform personalized treatment approaches and the pathogenesis of SLE flare following infection.

Identifiers

PMID31777831
PMCPMC6858011
OpenAlexW2969215868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.