Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777798›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2019

Confidence and Attitudes Toward Osteoarthritis Care Among the Current and Emerging Health Workforce: A Multinational Interprofessional Study.

Andrew M Briggs, Rana S Hinman, Ben Darlow, Kim L Bennell, Michelle Leech, Tania Pizzari, Alison M Greig, Crystal MacKay, Andrea Bendrups, Peter J Larmer and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew M BriggsSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-3098
Rana S HinmanDepartment of Physiotherapy University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-9456
Ben DarlowDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice University of Otago Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6814
Kim L BennellDepartment of Physiotherapy University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-5639
Michelle LeechFaculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia.
Tania PizzariLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre La Trobe University Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-0095
Alison M GreigDepartment of Physical Therapy University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1136-9255
Crystal MacKayToronto Rehabilitation Institute University Health Network Toronto Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3503-7025
Andrea BendrupsDepartment of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital) University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.
Peter J LarmerSchool of Clinical Sciences Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0839-330X
Alison Francis-CracknellDepartment of Physiotherapy Monash University Frankston Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-1484
Elizabeth HouldingSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7519-5063
Lucy A DesmondDepartment of Medicine Western Health Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8265-9057
Joanne E JordanHealthSense (Aust) Pty, Ltd Melbourne Australia.
Novia MinaeeSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia.
Helen SlaterSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-4988
Curtin University · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUAuckland University of Technology · NZLa Trobe University · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Ottawa · CAWestern Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure confidence and attitudes of the current and emerging interprofessional workforce concerning osteoarthritis (OA) care.

methodsStudy design is a multinational (Australia, New Zealand, Canada) cross-sectional survey of clinicians (general practitioners [GPs], GP registrars, primary care nurses, and physiotherapists) and final-year medical and physiotherapy students. GPs and GP registrars were only sampled in Australia/New Zealand and Australia, respectively. The study outcomes are as follows: confidence in OA knowledge and skills (customized instrument), biomedical attitudes to care (Pain Attitudes Beliefs Scale [PABS]), attitudes toward high- and low-value care (customized items), attitudes toward exercise/physical activity (free-text responses).

resultsA total of 1886 clinicians and 1161 students responded. Although a number of interprofessional differences were identified, confidence in OA knowledge and skills was consistently greatest among physiotherapists and lowest among nurses (eg, the mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] for physiotherapist-nurse analyses were 9.3 [7.7-10.9] for knowledge [scale: 11-55] and 14.6 [12.3-17.0] for skills [scale: 16-80]). Similarly, biomedical attitudes were stronger in nurses compared with physiotherapists (6.9 [5.3-8.4]; scale 10-60) and in medical students compared with physiotherapy students (2.0 [1.3-2.7]). Some clinicians and students agreed that people with OA will ultimately require total joint replacement (7%-19% and 19%-22%, respectively), that arthroscopy is an appropriate intervention for knee OA (18%-36% and 35%-44%), and that magnetic resonance imaging is informative for diagnosis and clinical management of hip/knee OA (8%-61% and 21%-52%). Most agreed (90%-98% and 92%-97%) that exercise is indicated and strongly supported by qualitative data.

conclusionWorkforce capacity building that de-emphasizes biomedical management and promotes high-value first-line care options is needed. Knowledge and skills among physiotherapists support leadership roles in OA care for this discipline.

Identifiers

PMID31777798
PMCPMC6857979
OpenAlexW2945175743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.