Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777720›Full record

ArticlePediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition2019

Risma K Kaban, Wardhana, Badriul Hegar, Rinawati Rohsiswatmo, Setyo Handryastuti, Novie Amelia, Dina Muktiarti, Flavia Indrio, Yvan Vandenplas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic effect ofArchives of medical science : AMS · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Risma K KabanDepartment of Pediatric Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-0077
WardhanaDepartment of Pediatric Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-0655
Badriul HegarDepartment of Pediatric Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5924-1664
Rinawati RohsiswatmoDepartment of Pediatric Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-4751
Setyo HandryastutiDepartment of Pediatric Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-9780
Novie AmeliaDepartment of Pediatric Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6147-4179
Dina MuktiartiDepartment of Pediatric Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-3354
Flavia IndrioDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-1360
Yvan VandenplasKidZ Health Castle, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-8651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFeeding tolerance is extremely important in preterm infants. This study aimed to evaluate whether preterm infants receiving

methodsThis double-blind randomized controlled trial of

resultsFeeding intolerance (vomiting and/or distension) was less common in the probiotic group than in the placebo group (8.5% vs. 25.5%; relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.96;

conclusionThe administration of

Indexed as

Feeding intoleranceLactobacillus reuteriPreterm

Identifiers

PMID31777720
PMCPMC6856506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.