Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777649›Full record

ReviewAoB PLANTS2019

Insights from invasion ecology: Can consideration of eco-evolutionary experience promote benefits from root mutualisms in plant production?

Josep Ramoneda, Johannes Le Roux, Emmanuel Frossard, Cecilia Bester, Noel Oettlé, Beat Frey, Hannes Andres Gamper

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AoB PLANTS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Josep RamonedaGroup of Plant Nutrition, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Lindau, Switzerland.
Johannes Le RouxDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emmanuel FrossardGroup of Plant Nutrition, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Lindau, Switzerland.
Cecilia BesterSouth African Agricultural Research Council (ARC-Infruitec), Nieuwoudtville Northern Cape, Stellenbosch Central, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Noel OettléEnvironmental Monitoring Group (EMG), Nieuwoudtville Northern Cape, South Africa.
Beat FreyRhizosphere Processes Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Hannes Andres GamperInstitute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
ETH Zurich · CHInstitute for Deciduous Fruit, Vines and Wine · ZAMacquarie University · AUScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutualistic plant-microbial functioning relies on co-adapted symbiotic partners as well as conducive environmental conditions. Choosing particular plant genotypes for domestication and subsequent cultivar selection can narrow the gene pools of crop plants to a degree that they are no longer able to benefit from microbial mutualists. Elevated mineral nutrient levels in cultivated soils also reduce the dependence of crops on nutritional support by mutualists such as mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia. Thus, current ways of crop production are predestined to compromise the propagation and function of microbial symbionts, limiting their long-term benefits for plant yield stability. The influence of mutualists on non-native plant establishment and spread, i.e. biological invasions, provides an unexplored analogue to contemporary crop production that accounts for mutualistic services from symbionts like rhizobia and mycorrhizae. The historical exposure of organisms to biotic interactions over evolutionary timescales, or so-called eco-evolutionary experience (EEE), has been used to explain the success of such invasions. In this paper, we stress that consideration of the EEE concept can shed light on how to overcome the loss of microbial mutualist functions following crop domestication and breeding. We propose specific experimental approaches to utilize the wild ancestors of crops to determine whether crop domestication compromised the benefits derived from root microbial symbioses or not. This can predict the potential for success of mutualistic symbiosis manipulation in modern crops and the maintenance of effective microbial mutualisms over the long term.

Indexed as

Adaptationbiological invasionsco-introductioncrop breedingcrop plant domesticationcrop wild relativeecological fittingplant–microbe interactionsrange expansionroot microbiomes

Identifiers

PMID31777649
PMCPMC6863469
OpenAlexW2975415871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.