ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Protective effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on intestinal mucosal injury after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastrointestinal injury in cardiopulmonary bypass: current insights and future directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Inflammatory Progression in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Current molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Fluid Management in Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy-Analysis of an Experimental Pig Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Association between inflammation in acute phase and early onset pneumonia in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to explore the protective effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on intestinal mucosal injury following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and to assess the potential mechanisms involved. A total of 24 healthy adult domestic pigs were selected as the study subjects. A ventricular fibrillation model was induced through programmed electric stimulation. Subsequently, the animals were randomly divided into conventional CPR and CPR+ECMO groups (n=12 per group). The mortality and hemodynamic parameters of the two groups were compared. The expression levels of inflammatory cytokines in the serum and intestinal mucosa were detected by ELISAs. The intestinal mucosa was subjected to hematoxylin and eosin, and immunohistochemical staining, followed by electron microscopy, to assess the degree of apoptosis and necrosis. The animals in both groups recovered from the programmed ventricular fibrillation. In the CPR group, two animals died at 2 h and two more animals died a further 2 h later, resulting in a 33.3% mortality rate, whereas no cases of mortality were observed in the CPR+ECMO group. Compared with the animals in the CPR group, the hemodynamic parameters of the animals in the CPR+ECMO group revealed significantly improved outcomes. Multiple inflammatory factors (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1 and interleukin-6), myeloperoxidase and malondialdehyde levels were decreased, whereas Na/Ca-ATPase and superoxide dismutase levels were elevated in the intestinal mucosa of animals in the CPR+ECMO group compared with those in the CPR group. Additionally, pathological staining demonstrated that the intestinal mucosa tissue in the CPR+ECMO group exhibited less apoptosis, necrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration, which was further supported by a decrease in Bax expression and an increase in Bcl-2 expression. Overall, ECMO after CPR reduced the intestinal mucosal barrier injury after spontaneous circulation recovery, and the mechanism involved decreased inflammation and apoptosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.