ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Global Postural Re-Education in Individuals With Text Neck Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Trial
- Motor control training versus soft tissue therapy in the treatment of upper crossed syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Optimizing lumbar therapy: a biomechanical study of oblique pulling manipulation under different postures.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Continuous Non-Invasive Assessment of Segmental Cervical Motion: A Narrative Review and Validation Framework.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine learning analysis of kinematic movement features during functional tasks to discriminate chronic neck pain patients from asymptomatic controls.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Kinematic and mechanical assessment of seated lumbar rotation manipulation: force, velocity and orientation in three dimensions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Quantitative analysis of the prone stretching and adjusting neck manipulation based on motion capture technology and three-dimensional force measuring tables.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- A webcam-based machine learning approach for three-dimensional range of motion evaluation.PloS one · 2023Article
- HeadUp: A Low-Cost Solution for Tracking Head Movement of Children with Cerebral Palsy Using IMU.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was received. The motion of the cervical spine in all directions was measured using the OMCS and CROM devices. Reproducibility of data was assessed using the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). Validity was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.