ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2016
Genetic Testing for Polyposis Syndromes.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic predisposition to polyposis syndromes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosed in the United States with up to 3% of cases being attributable to a hereditary polyposis syndrome. Established diagnostic and/or testing criteria exist for many of the recognized polyposis syndromes and are an important tool in guiding physicians in the identification of individuals who may benefit from referral to a cancer genetics service for hereditary cancer risk assessment. A formal hereditary cancer risk assessment supports fulfillment of obligations for standard of care, as well as minimizes the negative outcomes that may occur in the absence of informed consent for genetic testing. The implications of a diagnosis may extend beyond the individual patient to include at-risk relatives, and as such, much emphasis should be placed on identifying the most informative individual in a family in which to initiate testing. Advances in our understanding of genes associated with hereditary polyposis and the increasing use of testing that relies on next-generation sequencing technologies may lead to the increased likelihood of a genetic diagnosis; however, in those individuals without a genetic diagnosis whose histories remain concerning for hereditary polyposis, knowledge of family history may inform strategies for early detection and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.