Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777412›Full record

ArticleAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research2020

Field sampling of indoor bioaerosols.

Jennie Cox, Hamza Mbareche, William G Lindsley, Caroline Duchaine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Integrated Analysis Approach to Unravel theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Indoor bioaerosols and asthma: Overview, implications, and mitigation strategies.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Damp Buildings: Associated Fungi and How to Find Them.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the workplace: Key findings from a rapid review of the literature.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Microbial Contamination of Bedding Material: One Health in Poultry Production.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennie CoxDepartment of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Hamza MbarecheDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Bioinformatics, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
William G LindsleyNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Caroline DuchaineDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Bioinformatics, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because bioaerosols are related to adverse health effects in exposed humans and indoor environments represent a unique framework of exposure, concerns about indoor bioaerosols have risen over recent years. One of the major issues in indoor bioaerosol research is the lack of standardization in the methodology, from air sampling strategies and sample treatment to the analytical methods applied. The main characteristics to consider in the choice of indoor sampling methods for bioaerosols are the sampler performance, the representativeness of the sampling, and the concordance with the analytical methods to be used. The selection of bioaerosol collection methods is directly dependent on the analytical methods, which are chosen to answer specific questions raised while designing a study for exposure assessment. In this review, the authors present current practices in the analytical methods and the sampling strategies, with specificity for each type of microbe (fungi, bacteria, archaea and viruses). In addition, common problems and errors to be avoided are discussed. Based on this work, recommendations are made for future efforts towards the development of viable bioaerosol samplers, standards for bioaerosol exposure limits, and making association studies to optimize the use of the big data provided by high-throughput sequencing methods.

Identifiers

PMID31777412
PMCPMC6880939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.