Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777251›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2019

Allostery and Kinetic Proofreading.

Vahe Galstyan, Rob Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Eukaryotic gene regulation at equilibrium, or non?Current opinion in systems biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vahe GalstyanBiochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Option , California Institute of Technology , Pasadena , California 91125 , United States.
Rob PhillipsDepartment of Physics , California Institute of Technology , Pasadena , California 91125 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3082-2809

Funding

The Principles of Regulatory, Conformational and Evolutionary AdaptationR35GM118043 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ROB PHILLIPS · 2016 to 2026
$7.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinetic proofreading is an error correction mechanism present in the processes of the central dogma and beyond and typically requires the free energy of nucleotide hydrolysis for its operation. Though the molecular players of many biological proofreading schemes are known, our understanding of how energy consumption is managed to promote fidelity remains incomplete. In our work, we introduce an alternative conceptual scheme called "the piston model of proofreading" in which enzyme activation through hydrolysis is replaced with allosteric activation achieved through mechanical work performed by a piston on regulatory ligands. Inspired by Feynman's ratchet and pawl mechanism, we consider a mechanical engine designed to drive the piston actions powered by a lowering weight, whose function is analogous to that of ATP synthase in cells. Thanks to its mechanical design, the piston model allows us to tune the "knobs" of the driving engine and probe the graded changes and trade-offs between speed, fidelity, and energy dissipation. It provides an intuitive explanation of the conditions necessary for optimal proofreading and reveals the unexpected capability of allosteric molecules to beat the Hopfield limit of fidelity by leveraging the diversity of states available to them. The framework that we have built for the piston model can also serve as a basis for additional studies of driven biochemical systems.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalProtein BiosynthesisAllosteric RegulationEnergy TransferEnzymesHydrolysisKineticsLigandsProtein BindingSubstrate SpecificityThermodynamicsEnzymesLigands

Identifiers

PMID31777251
PMCPMC6995354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.