Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777183›Full record

SynthesisMaternal & child nutrition2020

Neonatal weight loss and gain patterns in caesarean section born infants: integrative systematic review.

Niamh M Kelly, Jessica V Keane, Rachel B Gallimore, Debra Bick, Rachel M Tribe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07320287 (A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Effects of Multi-strain Bacillus Spore Probiotic Supplements), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07320287 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Effects of Multi-strain Bacillus Spore Probiotic Supplements (LiveSpo PREG-MOM and LiveSpo CONSY) on Growth Metrics, Prevention of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, and Modulation of the Gut Microbiota in Cesarean-Delivered Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnabio R&DRan2026 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsFunctional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs), Weight LossArmsRO water, LiveSpo PREG-MOM, LiveSpo CONSY
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Relationship Between Type of Delivery and Growth Trajectory in the First Year of Life: The Araraquara Cohort Study.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niamh M KellyDept. of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1248-2612
Jessica V KeaneDept. of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London, UK.
Rachel B GallimoreMaternity Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2936-2841
Debra BickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Rachel M TribeDept. of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-9978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is evidence that caesarean section delivery can impact on neonatal weight loss and weight gain patterns in the first 5 days of life. We conducted an integrative systematic review to examine the association of mode of delivery on early neonatal weight loss. Pubmed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online were searched for relevant papers published before June 2019. Reference lists from the relevant papers were then backwards and forwards searched. As neonatal weight loss was reported in different formats, a meta-analysis could not be carried out. Most studies did not distinguish between elective and emergency caesarean sections or instrumental and nonassisted vaginal deliveries. Seven papers were included. All papers except one found that caesarean section was associated with higher weight loss in the early days of life. Two papers presented data from studies on babies followed up to 1 month. One study found that on day 25, babies born by caesarean section had significantly higher weight gain than those born vaginally, while another found that by day 28, babies born vaginally gained more weight per day (11.9 g/kg/day) than those born by caesarean section (10.9 g/kg/day; p = .02). Overall, infants born by caesarean section lost more weight than those born vaginally, but due to the small number of studies included, more are needed to look at this difference and why it may occur. This discrepancy in weight between the two groups may be corrected over time, but future studies will need larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to examine this.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleWeight GainWeight Lossbreastfeedingcaesarean sectionexcessive weight lossinfant feedinginfant growthmode of deliveryneonatal growthneonatal weight loss

Identifiers

PMID31777183
PMCPMC7083401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.