Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777175›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2019

Expanding the uses of genome-scale models with protein structures.

Nathan Mih, Bernhard O Palsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Drug Research Meets Network Science: Where Are We?Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nathan MihDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Bernhard O PalssonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-6785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biology is reaching a convergence point of its historic reductionist and modern holistic approaches to understanding the living system. Structural biology has historically taken the reductionist approach to deeply probe the inner workings of complex molecular machines. In contrast, systems biology and genome-scale modeling have organically grown out of the wealth of data now being generated by diverse omics measurements. In the late 2000s, a proposed interdisciplinary field of structural systems biology pitched the merger of these two approaches, with widespread applications in pharmacology, disease modeling, protein engineering, and evolutionary studies. In this commentary, we highlight the challenges of integrating these two fields, with a focus on genome-scale metabolic modeling, and the novel findings that are made possible from such a merger.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalProtein ConformationProteinsSystems BiologyProteins

Identifiers

PMID31777175
PMCPMC6880182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.