Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31777063›Full record

ReviewImmunology2020

Growing, evolving and sticking in a flowing environment: understanding IgA interactions with bacteria in the gut.

Daniel Hoces, Markus Arnoldini, Médéric Diard, Claude Loverdo, Emma Slack

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. AInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Vaccines · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. ControllingInfection and immunity · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fluid flow structures gut microbiota biofilm communities by distributing public goods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel HocesDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1451-5166
Markus ArnoldiniDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Médéric DiardBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0851-4391
Claude LoverdoLaboratoire Jean Perrin, Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0888-1717
Emma SlackDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-1145
ETH Zurich · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunology research in the last 50 years has made huge progress in understanding the mechanisms of anti-bacterial defense of deep, normally sterile, tissues such as blood, spleen and peripheral lymph nodes. In the intestine, with its dense commensal microbiota, it seems rare that this knowledge can be simply translated. Here we put forward the idea that perhaps it is not always the theory of immunology that is lacking to explain mucosal immunity, but rather that we have overlooked crucial parts of the mucosal immunological language required for its translation: namely intestinal and bacterial physiology. We will try to explain this in the context of intestinal secretory antibodies (mainly secretory IgA), which have been described to prevent, to alter, to not affect, or to promote colonization of the intestine and gut-draining lymphoid tissues, and where effector mechanisms have remained elusive. In fact, these apparently contradictory outcomes can be generated by combining the basic premises of bacterial agglutination with an understanding of bacterial growth (i.e. secretory IgA-driven enchained growth), fluid handling and bacterial competition in the gut lumen.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalAnimalsBacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryIntestinal MucosaPopulation DynamicsSignal TransductionImmunoglobulin A, Secretoryimmunoglobulin Amicrobiotamodelingphysiologypopulation dynamics

Identifiers

PMID31777063
PMCPMC6904610
OpenAlexW2990307826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.