Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776909›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Response of growth, antioxidant enzymes and root exudates production towards As stress in Pteris vittata and in Astragalus sinicus colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Liu Yizhu, Muhammad Imtiaz, Allah Ditta, Muhammad Shahid Rizwan, Muhammad Ashraf, Sajid Mehmood, Omar Aziz, Fathia Mubeen, Muhammad Ali, Nosheen Noor Elahi and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insights into conventional and recent technologies for arsenic bioremediation: A systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. AMF colonization affects allelopathic effects ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Liu YizhuInstitute of Agriculture Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Muhammad ImtiazSoil and Environmental Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan. m.imtiazpk92@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2098-7899
Allah DittaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal, Dir (U), 18000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shahid RizwanCholistan Institute of Desert Studies, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Muhammad AshrafDepartment of Soil Science, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Sajid MehmoodGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Omar AzizUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Sub-Campus Depalpur, Okara, Pakistan.
Fathia MubeenSoil and Environmental Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad AliDepartment of Biotechnology, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Nosheen Noor ElahiInstitute of Pure and Applied Biology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Raina IjazDepartment of Horticulture, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Sha LeleSuzhou Leju Holdings Limited, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Cao ShuangWuhan Environmental Protection Sciences Research Institute, Wuhan, China.
Shuxin TuCollege of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. stu@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Bahauddin Zakariya University · PKNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering · PKCOMSATS University Islamabad · PKGuangzhou University · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning · CNIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKShaheed Benazir Bhutto University · PKUniversity of Azad Jammu and Kashmir · PKUniversity of Faisalabad · PKWuhan Research Institute of Materials Protection · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern agricultural practices have led to improve the contaminated soils with a variety of heavy metals that have become a major environmental concern. The use of arbuscular mycorrihizal fungi (AMF) is considered a potential tool for the sustainable agriculture especially in contaminated sites. Moreover, recently, the use of AMF has become a fascinating and multidisciplinary subject for the scientists dealing with plant protection. The present study was carried out to evaluate the interaction among arsenic (As) species, AMF, and two plant species: Pteris vittata and Astragalus sinicus, differing in their metal tolerance. Results about A. sinicus revealed that the biomass was affected as As (III and V) accumulated in the roots of A. sinicus, and in rachis and pinnae of P. vittata. The inoculation of AMF markedly increased the biomass yield of the both plants when exposed to As species. The exposure to the As species resulted variation and non-significant results about antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymes when grown in As stress with and without AMF. The inoculation of AMF under As species improved the organic acids concentrations in both plant species. Overall, the concentration of oxalate acid was more than formic and malic acids; however, AMF inoculation improved more organic acids in A. sinicus. P. vittata exhibited more activities of antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymes under As stress with and without AMF than A. sinicus, and hence had a more efficient defense mechanism.

Indexed as

ArsenicMycorrhizaePterisSoil PollutantsAntioxidantsPlant RootsAntioxidantsArsenicSoil PollutantsAntioxidant enzymesArbuscular myccorhizal fungi (AMF)ArsenicA. sinicusOrganic acidsP. vittata

Identifiers

PMID31776909
OpenAlexW2990079870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.