ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020
Use of real-world registry data: a hernia mesh example.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesh-based inguinal hernia repairs in an integrated healthcare system and surgeon and hospital volume: a cohort study of 110,808 patients from over a decade.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Article
- Data quality validation of the Spanish Incisional Hernia Surgery Registry (EVEREG): pilot study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Article
- Tale of Two Centres-Exploring Bedside Challenges to Implementing a Clinical Quality Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Metropolitan Australia.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeClinical performance of hernia mesh devices is poorly understood due to a lack of relevant clinical trial and real-world data (RWD). Registries offer a means to capture longitudinal data in real-world practice. This report highlights the need for data quality, completeness, and appropriate analysis methodology for more accurate and informed interpretation of RWE of medical devices.
methodsHernia mesh registry data were used to cross-tabulate the 30-day infection rate of patients who received one of four mesh types.
resultsInitial data review suggested lower infection rate for permanent mesh versus absorbable mesh. Additional registry RWD were factored into the analysis, providing more context in the interpretation of the results.
conclusionsHigh-quality registries can be used to generate real-world evidence (RWE) to support surveillance and other regulatory decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31776875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.