Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776756›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

A novel "embryo-endometrial" adhesion model can potentially predict "receptive" or "non-receptive" endometrium.

Jemma Evans, Kathryn J Walker, Maree Bilandzic, Sophie Kinnear, Lois A Salamonsen

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MiR-29c-3p Impairs the Adhesion of Endometrial Epithelial Cells via COL4A1/β-catenin in Endometriosis.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jemma EvansThe Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. Jemma.evans@hudson.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3300-8127
Kathryn J WalkerThe Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Maree BilandzicThe Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Sophie KinnearThe Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Lois A SalamonsenThe Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1139489;1141946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish a model of human implantation that responds to hormonal stimuli and can differentiate between endometrium from fertile women and those with idiopathic infertility.

designA trophoblast stem cell (trophectodermal) line (TSC; derived from human pre-implantation embryo) was used to form trophectodermal spheroids (TS). TS attachment to monolayers of endometrial epithelial cell lines or primary endometrial epithelial cells (pHEECs) was determined.

settingIndependent Medical Research Institute with close clinical linkages

interventionsSpheroid attachment and outgrowth was determined with added hormones (estradiol 17β (E), E + medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or E + MPA + human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)). Spheroid attachment to E/MPA treated pHEEC prepared from fertile women or those with idiopathic infertility tested.

main outcome measureFirmly attached spheroids counted after co-culture for 6 h. Outgrowth was determined by quantitation of area covered by spheroid after firm adhesion.

resultsFunctional adhesion of TS to two endometrial epithelial cell lines, Ishikawa and ECC-1 cells, was hormonally responsive, with adhesion/outgrowth increased by E/MPA (ECC-1; p < 0.01, Ishikawa; p < 0.01) and E/MPA/hCG (ECC-1; p < 0.001, Ishikawa p < 0.01) versus E alone. The same pattern of hormone responsiveness was observed in pHEEC obtained from fertile women (E vs, E/MPA; p < 0.01, E vs. E/MPA/hCG; p < 0.001). TS adhered to 85% of pHEEC obtained from fertile women (11/13) and 11% of pHEEC obtained from women with unexplained infertility (2/18, p < 0.001).

conclusionThis new model of "embryo" implantation largely discriminates between endometrial epithelial cells obtained from fertile vs. infertile women based on adhesion; this holds potential as an in vitro "diagnostic" tool of endometrial infertility.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCoculture TechniquesEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo, MammalianEndometriumEpithelial CellsEstradiolEstrogensFemaleFertilityHumansInfertility, FemaleSpheroids, CellularTrophoblastsEstradiolEstrogensFertileImplantation modelInfertileReceptive endometriumTrophectodermal spheroid

Identifiers

PMID31776756
PMCPMC7000590
OpenAlexW2991271309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.