Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776652›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2020

Growth Pattern of Magnetic Field-Treated Bacteria.

Samina Masood, Iram Saleem, Derek Smith, Wei-Kan Chu

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of Static Magnetic Field onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samina MasoodDepartment of Physical and Applied Sciences, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX, 77058, USA. masood@uhcl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-8190
Iram SaleemDepartment of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-8581
Derek SmithDepartment of Physical and Applied Sciences, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX, 77058, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9039-0572
Wei-Kan ChuDepartment of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3646-474X
University of Houston · USUniversity of Houston - Clear Lake · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A study of the induced effect of different types of weak magnetic field exposure on bacterial growth is performed, comparing the relative changes after removal from the magnetic fields. This investigation is relevant to understand the effect of magnetic field exposure on human beings due to electronic devices. For this purpose, we use four species of common bacteria in reference to human health and safety including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The choice of these four bacteria also allows us to check for effects which rely upon the Gram-staining properties or shapes of bacterial species. These species were initially exposed to static, non-homogeneous, and alternating weak magnetic fields, and then they were grown in incubators in the same environment at 37 °C simultaneously. Comparative measurements of optical density are then used to track the sustained impact on bacterial growth in the experimental samples. Bacteria were first grown in different weak magnetic fields on a plain glass surface both in liquid and solid media. Magnetic field-treated bacteria were then transferred into similar test tubes to grow in an incubator concurrently. Bacterial cultures in liquid nutrient broth on plain glass proliferated faster in most species. Different magnetic fields affect the growth pattern of bacteria differently, depending on the bacterial strain. The weak magnetic field seems to decelerate the growth rate, even after the magnetic field is removed. With application of this study, we can potentially investigate the effect of weak field exposures on Eukaryotic cells and gene dynamics.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionMagnetic FieldsBacteriaEscherichia coliGlassPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidis

Identifiers

PMID31776652
OpenAlexW2889047434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.