Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776632›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

The

Johanna Maffey-Steffan, Lorenza Scarpa, Anna Svirydenka, Bernhard Nilica, Christian Mair, Sabine Buxbaum, Jasmin Bektic, Elisabeth von Guggenberg, Christian Uprimny, Wolfgang Horninger and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  4. The Prostate · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Impact of extended [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy and safety of rechallenge with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Development of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  15. Advances in PET imaging of cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Production Review of Accelerator-Based Medical Isotopes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna Maffey-SteffanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Lorenza ScarpaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna Svirydenka
Bernhard NilicaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian MairDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabine BuxbaumDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jasmin BekticDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elisabeth von GuggenbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian UprimnyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolfgang HorningerDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Irene VirgoliniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. irene.virgolini@i-med.ac.at.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA new therapeutic option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) of heavily pre-treated patients lies in

methodsOn the basis of PSMA-targeted

results

conclusionSerial PSA measurements and post-therapy 24 h WB scintigraphy seems to allow a sufficiently accurate follow-up of

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantDipeptidesFollow-Up StudiesGallium RadioisotopesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDipeptidesGallium RadioisotopesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingRadiopharmaceuticals177Lu-PSMA-61768Ga-PSMA-11DosimetryMetastasized castrationPost-therapy whole-body scintigraphyresistant prostate cancerTheragnostic concept

Identifiers

PMID31776632
PMCPMC7005064
OpenAlexW4235024266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.