Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2020
Impact of per-operative antibiotics on the urinary tract infection rate following mid-urethral sling surgery for urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infection after continence surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A Nordic perspective on female stress urinary incontinence care: Lessons for shared clinical practice.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Impact of Preoperative Urinary Tract Infection Screening in Asymptomatic Women Undergoing Midurethral Sling.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to compare the effect of antibiotics versus no antibiotics prophylaxis per-operatively on the frequency of urinary tract infection (UTI) following mid-urethral sling application to treat stress or mixed urinary incontinence.
methodsThis study was designed as a multicenter prospective randomized trial. Women were included from eight centers in three countries. Women were aged under 60 years and had objectively verified stress urinary incontinence. Women with mixed urinary incontinence were also included. Randomization was held in blocks for operation with either antibiotics or no antibiotics. UTI was defined in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for symptomatic UTI. Women were followed up at 3, 12, and 36 months. This was part of a trial comparing subjective cure rate in relation to application of Ajust® (single-incision mid-urethral slings) versus standard mid-urethral slings.
resultsThe main outcome was to evaluate if per-operative antibiotics had any impact on UTI following sling surgery. In total, 305 women were randomized (158 [52%] to antibiotics and 147 [48%] to no antibiotics). Demographic data disclosed no differences between the two groups. The trial did not show any difference between the two groups regarding the frequency of postoperative UTI. Logistic regression analysis disclosed only residual urine volume at 3 months' follow-up as a significant risk factor for UTIs. Per-operative antibiotics had no influence on the frequency of mesh erosions or any other complication.
conclusionsOur trial does not suggest any beneficial effect of per-operative antibiotics on the risk of post-operative UTIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.