Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776601›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2020

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of skeletal dysplasias.

Leah A Gilligan, Maria A Calvo-Garcia, K Nicole Weaver, Beth M Kline-Fath

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine development in vivo: a retrospective study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of the fetal lungs in utero.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leah A GilliganDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. leah.gilligan@mchs.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4632-7004
Maria A Calvo-GarciaDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
K Nicole WeaverDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Beth M Kline-FathDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is obtained for prenatal diagnosis and prognostication of skeletal dysplasias; however, related literature is limited.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to define the utility of fetal MRI for skeletal dysplasias and to report MRI findings associated with specific diagnoses. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. Women referred for suspected fetal skeletal dysplasia who underwent MRI between January 2003 and December 2018 were included. Definitive diagnoses were determined by genetic testing, autopsy, physical examination and/or postnatal/postmortem imaging. Fetal MRI examinations and reports were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize imaging findings.

resultsEighty-nine women were referred for fetal MRI for possible skeletal dysplasia. Forty-three (48%) were determined to have a diagnosis other than skeletal dysplasia and nine were excluded for lack of specific skeletal dysplasia diagnosis. Thirty-seven cases of skeletal dysplasia with available fetal MRI and specific diagnosis were included for analysis. Diagnoses included achondrogenesis (n=2), achondroplasia (n=5), Boomerang dysplasia (n=1), campomelic dysplasia (n=2), Jeune syndrome (n=1), Kniest dysplasia (n=1), osteogenesis imperfecta (n=15) and thanatophoric dysplasia (n=10). A specific skeletal dysplasia diagnosis was mentioned in 17/37 (46%) of MRI imaging reports and correct for 14/17 (82%). MRI findings were reported for each specific skeletal dysplasia diagnosis.

conclusionFetal MRI is a useful diagnostic tool for skeletal dyplasias and excluded the diagnosis in nearly half of referred pregnancies. In addition to providing fetal lung volumes, fetal MRI demonstrates findings of the brain in achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia, of the spine in achondroplasia and achondrogenesis, of the calvarium in osteogenesis imperfecta and thanatophoric dysplasia, and of the cartilage in Kniest dysplasia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBone and BonesBone Diseases, DevelopmentalFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAchondroplasiaFetusMagnetic resonance imagingOsteogenesis imperfectaSkeletal dysplasiaThanatophoric dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID31776601
OpenAlexW2991043050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.