Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776543›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2020

A novel bioinformatics approach to identify the consistently well-performing normalization strategy for current metabolomic studies.

Qingxia Yang, Jiajun Hong, Yi Li, Weiwei Xue, Song Li, Hui Yang, Feng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The miRNA: a small but powerful RNA for COVID-19.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Genomic Variation Prediction: A Summary From Different Views.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qingxia YangPh.D. candidates of Zhejiang University, China, and jointly cultivated by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Chongqing University, China. Their main research interests include OMICs-based bioinformatics and statistical metabolomics.
Jiajun HongPh.D. candidates of Zhejiang University, China, and jointly cultivated by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Chongqing University, China. Their main research interests include OMICs-based bioinformatics and statistical metabolomics.
Yi LiPh.D. candidates of Zhejiang University, China, and jointly cultivated by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Chongqing University, China. Their main research interests include OMICs-based bioinformatics and statistical metabolomics.
Weiwei XuePh.D. candidates of Zhejiang University, China, and jointly cultivated by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Chongqing University, China. Their main research interests include OMICs-based bioinformatics and statistical metabolomics.
Song LiPh.D. candidates of Zhejiang University, China, and jointly cultivated by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Chongqing University, China. Their main research interests include OMICs-based bioinformatics and statistical metabolomics.
Hui YangPh.D. candidates of Zhejiang University, China, and jointly cultivated by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Chongqing University, China. Their main research interests include OMICs-based bioinformatics and statistical metabolomics.
Feng ZhuPh.D. candidates of Zhejiang University, China, and jointly cultivated by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Chongqing University, China. Their main research interests include OMICs-based bioinformatics and statistical metabolomics.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unwanted experimental/biological variation and technical error are frequently encountered in current metabolomics, which requires the employment of normalization methods for removing undesired data fluctuations. To ensure the 'thorough' removal of unwanted variations, the collective consideration of multiple criteria ('intragroup variation', 'marker stability' and 'classification capability') was essential. However, due to the limited number of available normalization methods, it is extremely challenging to discover the appropriate one that can meet all these criteria. Herein, a novel approach was proposed to discover the normalization strategies that are consistently well performing (CWP) under all criteria. Based on various benchmarks, all normalization methods popular in current metabolomics were 'first' discovered to be non-CWP. 'Then', 21 new strategies that combined the 'sample'-based method with the 'metabolite'-based one were found to be CWP. 'Finally', a variety of currently available methods (such as cubic splines, range scaling, level scaling, EigenMS, cyclic loess and mean) were identified to be CWP when combining with other normalization. In conclusion, this study not only discovered several strategies that performed consistently well under all criteria, but also proposed a novel approach that could ensure the identification of CWP strategies for future biological problems.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMetabolomicsResearch Designarea under the curvebioinformaticsconsistency scoremetabolomicsnormalization

Identifiers

PMID31776543
PMCPMC7711263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.