Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776399›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

High efficacy full allelic CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in tetraploid potato.

Ida Elisabeth Johansen, Ying Liu, Bodil Jørgensen, Eric Paul Bennett, Erik Andreasson, Kåre L Nielsen, Andreas Blennow, Bent Larsen Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genome-Editing ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ida Elisabeth JohansenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Ying LiuDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Bodil JørgensenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Eric Paul BennettCopenhagen Center for Glycomics, Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Odontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Erik AndreassonResistance Biology, Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Kåre L NielsenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Andreas BlennowDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Bent Larsen PetersenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. blp@plen.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2004-9077
University of Copenhagen · DKAalborg University · DKSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

HTS for FADD kinase inhibitors using molecular imagingR21CA131859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REHEMTULLA, ALNAWAZ · 2008 to 2009
$277k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 editing efficacies in tetraploid potato were highly improved through the use of endogenous potato U6 promoters. Highly increased editing efficiencies in the Granular Bound Starch Synthase gene at the protoplast level were obtained by replacement of the Arabidopsis U6 promotor, driving expression of the CRISPR component, with endogenous potato U6 promotors. This translated at the ex-plant level into 35% full allelic gene editing. Indel Detection Amplicon Analysis was established as an efficient tool for fast assessment of gene editing in complex genomes, such as potato. Together, this warrants significant reduction of laborious cell culturing, ex-plant regeneration and screening procedures of plants with high complexity genomes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingPlant BreedingSolanum tuberosumTetraploidy

Identifiers

PMID31776399
PMCPMC6881354
OpenAlexW2989848563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.