Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776382›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A comparative metabolomics analysis of the components of heartwood and sapwood in Taxus chinensis (Pilger) Rehd.

Fenjuan Shao, Lisha Zhang, Juan Guo, Xiaochun Liu, Wenhui Ma, Iain W Wilson, Deyou Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Natural Taxanes: From Plant Composition to Human Pharmacology and Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Differences in Chemical Constituents betweenMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Authentication ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fenjuan ShaoState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-3762
Lisha ZhangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China.
Juan GuoResearch Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China.
Xiaochun LiuGansu Forestry and Grassland Administration, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Wenhui MaLiangdang Forestry Administration, Gansu Province, 742400, China.
Iain W WilsonCSIRO Agriculture and Food, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4626-8059
Deyou QiuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China. qiudy@caf.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-0302
Chinese Academy of Forestry · CNState Forestry and Grassland Administration · CNCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxus chinensis is a well-known gymnosperm with great ornamental and medicinal value. Its purple red brown heartwood (HW) has many attributes such as straight texture, high density, mechanical strength, rich elasticity and corrosion resistance that is highly prized commercially. T. chinensis sapwood (SW), in comparison, lacks these important traits. At present, little is known about the differences of metabolites between the SW and HW in T. chinensis. Widely targeted metabolic profiling was performed to analyze the metabolic profiles of HW and SW in T. chinensis using Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry (LC-EI-MS). A total of 607 metabolites were detected in HW and SW. Among them, 146 metabolites were significantly higher, and 167 metabolites significantly lower, in HW as compared to SW. These differential metabolites were mainly involved in metabolic pathways and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, flavone and flavonol, phenylpropanoids and antibiotics. Moreover, 71 flavonoids and isoflavones were found to be significantly different between HW and SW. Our results show the difference of components between the HW and SW, which has potential significance to further elucidate the mechanism of HW color formation. The results will provide insight into the metabolites associated with wood color formation and useful information for understanding the metabolites associated with wood quality.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidFlavonoidsIsoflavonesMetabolomicsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationTaxusWoodFlavonoidsIsoflavones

Identifiers

PMID31776382
PMCPMC6881444
OpenAlexW2990233149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.