Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Cooperative update of beliefs and state-transition functions in human reinforcement learning.

Hiroshi Higashi, Tetsuto Minami, Shigeki Nakauchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hiroshi HigashiGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. higashi-h@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-3411
Tetsuto MinamiElectronics-Inspired Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3034-6195
Shigeki NakauchiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely known that reinforcement learning systems in the brain contribute to learning via interactions with the environment. These systems are capable of solving multidimensional problems, in which some dimensions are relevant to a reward, while others are not. To solve these problems, computational models use Bayesian learning, a strategy supported by behavioral and neural evidence in human. Bayesian learning takes into account beliefs, which represent a learner's confidence in a particular dimension being relevant to the reward. Beliefs are given as a posterior probability of the state-transition (reward) function that maps the optimal actions to the states in each dimension. However, when it comes to implementing this learning strategy, the order in which beliefs and state-transition functions update remains unclear. The present study investigates this update order using a trial-by-trial analysis of human behavior and electroencephalography signals during a task in which learners have to identify the reward-relevant dimension. Our behavioral and neural results reveal a cooperative update-within 300 ms after the outcome feedback, the state-transition functions are updated, followed by the beliefs for each dimension.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCultureRewardBrainFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansMachine LearningModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID31776353
PMCPMC6881319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.