Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776347›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

A revised model for promoter competition based on multi-way chromatin interactions at the α-globin locus.

A Marieke Oudelaar, Caroline L Harrold, Lars L P Hanssen, Jelena M Telenius, Douglas R Higgs, Jim R Hughes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CTCF Mediates the Cis-Regulatory Hubs in Mouse Hearts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Is Enhancer Function Driven by Protein-Protein Interactions? From Bacteria to Leukemia.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The human malaria parasiteProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Marieke OudelaarMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4016-6158
Caroline L HarroldMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-0242
Lars L P HanssenMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-2278
Jelena M TeleniusMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4353-3854
Douglas R HiggsMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-8705
Jim R HughesMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. jim.hughes@imm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-7256
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000801Medical Research Council MC_U137961144Medical Research Council MC_U137961145Medical Research Council MC_UU_00016/14Medical Research Council MC_UU_00016/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12009/15Medical Research Council MC_UU_12009/4Medical Research Council MR/N00969X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific communication between gene promoters and enhancers is critical for accurate regulation of gene expression. However, it remains unclear how specific interactions between multiple regulatory elements contained within a single chromatin domain are coordinated. Recent technological advances which can detect multi-way chromatin interactions at single alleles can provide insights into how multiple regulatory elements cooperate or compete for transcriptional activation. Here, we use such an approach to investigate how interactions of the α-globin enhancers are distributed between multiple promoters in a mouse model in which the α-globin domain is extended to include several additional genes. Our data show that gene promoters do not form mutually exclusive interactions with enhancers, but all interact simultaneously in a single complex. These findings suggest that promoters do not structurally compete for interactions with enhancers, but form a regulatory hub structure, which is consistent with recent models of transcriptional activation occurring in non-membrane bound nuclear compartments.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, Geneticalpha-GlobinsAnimalsBinding SitesChromatinEnhancer Elements, GeneticFemaleGenetic LociMembrane ProteinsMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Mutant StrainsModels, Geneticalpha-GlobinsChromatinMembrane ProteinsRhbdf1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID31776347
PMCPMC6881440
OpenAlexW2989914470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.