Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776237›Full record

ArticlemSphere2019

Multilaboratory Comparison of Pneumococcal Multiplex Immunoassays Used in Immunosurveillance of Streptococcus pneumoniae across Europe.

Bob Meek, Nina Ekström, Bjørn Kantsø, Rachael Almond, Jamie Findlow, Jenna F Gritzfeld, Charlotte Sværke Jørgensen, Karl Ljungberg, Fredrik Atterfelt, Manou R Batstra and 11 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Bob Meek *Medical Microbiology & Immunology Department, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands b.meek@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3410-9912
Nina Ekström *National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Bjørn KantsøStatens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rachael AlmondPublic Health England, Public Health Laboratory, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jamie FindlowPublic Health England, Public Health Laboratory, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jenna F GritzfeldPublic Health England, Public Health Laboratory, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Charlotte Sværke JørgensenStatens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karl LjungbergPublic Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik AtterfeltPublic Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.
Manou R BatstraReinier HAGA MDC, Delft, The Netherlands.
Kevin AndewegReinier HAGA MDC, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ben A W de JongMedical Microbiology & Immunology Department, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Harry E PrinceQuest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Mary Lapé-NixonQuest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Pieter G M GageldonkNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Irina TcherniaevaNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ingeborg AabergeNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Tove Karin HerstadNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Merit MelinNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Ger T RijkersMedical Microbiology & Immunology Department, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Guy A BerbersNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance studies are required to estimate the impact of pneumococcal vaccination in both children and the elderly across Europe. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) as standard methods for immune surveillance of pneumococcal antibodies. However, as levels of antibodies to multiple serotypes are monitored in thousands of samples, a need for a less laborious and more flexible method has evolved. Fluorescent-bead-based multiplex immunoassays (MIAs) are suitable for this purpose. An increasing number of public health and diagnostic laboratories use MIAs, although the method is not standardized and no international quality assessment scheme exists. The EU Pneumo Multiplex Assay Consortium was initiated in 2013 to advance harmonization of MIAs and to create an international quality assessment scheme. In a multilaboratory comparison organized by the consortium, agreement among nine laboratories that used their own optimized MIA was assessed on a panel of 15 reference sera for 13 pneumococcal serotypes with the new WHO standard 007sp. Agreement was assessed in terms of assay accuracy, reproducibility, repeatability, precision, and bias. The results indicate that the evaluated MIAs are robust and reproducible for measurement of vaccine-induced antibody responses. However, some serotype-specific variability in the results was observed in comparisons of polysaccharides from different sources and of different conjugation methods, especially for serotype 4. On the basis of the results, the consortium has contributed to the harmonization of MIA protocols to improve reliability of immune surveillance of

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialEpidemiological MonitoringEuropeHumansImmunoassayPneumococcal InfectionsReproducibility of ResultsSerogroupStreptococcus pneumoniaeAntibodies, Bacterialcapsular polysaccharideconcordanceIgG antibodiesimmunoserologyinterlaboratory comparisonmultiplex immunoassayquantitative methodsserosurveillanceStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID31776237
PMCPMC6881716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.