Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776230›Full record

GuidelineGut2020

British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Matthew D Rutter, James East, Colin J Rees, Neil Cripps, James Docherty, Sunil Dolwani, Philip V Kaye, Kevin J Monahan, Marco R Novelli, Andrew Plumb and 12 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 164 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04889352 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Timing of Follow-up Colonoscopy: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Trial to Test the Utility of a Knowledge Translation Tool

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled29ConditionsColo-rectal Cancer, Colon Polyp, Colonic Polyp, Rectal PolypArmsAccess to colonoscopy web app
NCT06271980 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Predicting Long-Term Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survivors

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled177ConditionsColorectal Cancer Recurrent, Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal AdenocarcinomaArmsENCORE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Observational
  15. Using FIT Thresholds for Priority Triage and Risk Stratification in Resource-Constrained Systems.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Management of Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesions in Elderly Patients.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Matthew D RutterGastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK matt.rutter@nth.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-0295
James EastTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Colin J ReesNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Neil CrippsWestern Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK.
James DochertyColorectal surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.
Sunil DolwaniGastroenterology, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.
Philip V KayeHistopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK.
Kevin J MonahanFamily History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-4003
Marco R NovelliHistopathology, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew PlumbCentre for Medical Imaging, UCL, London, UK.
Brian P SaundersEndoscopy, St Marks Hospital, London, UK.
Siwan Thomas-GibsonWolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Damian J M TolanClinical Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Sophie WhyteSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Stewart BonningtonGastroenterology, University Hospital of Hartlepool, Hartlepool, UK.
Alison ScopeSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ruth WongSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Barbara HibbertLondon, UK.
John MarshLondon, UK.
Billie MooresCancer Screening, Public Health England, London, UK.
Amanda CrossDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of Imperial College, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Linda SharpInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25004Department of Health HTA/15/80/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

These consensus guidelines were jointly commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and Public Health England (PHE). They provide an evidence-based framework for the use of surveillance colonoscopy and non-colonoscopic colorectal imaging in people aged 18 years and over. They are the first guidelines that take into account the introduction of national bowel cancer screening. For the first time, they also incorporate surveillance of patients following resection of either adenomatous or serrated polyps and also post-colorectal cancer resection. They are primarily aimed at healthcare professionals, and aim to address:Which patients should commence surveillance post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection?What is the appropriate surveillance interval?When can surveillance be stopped? two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia);

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansLong-Term CareNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient SelectionPopulation SurveillancePostoperative Periodcolonic polypscolonoscopycolorectal adenomascolorectal cancersurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31776230
PMCPMC6984062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.