Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31776197›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2020

Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making: a scenario-based simulation study.

Pascale Carayon, Peter Hoonakker, Ann Schoofs Hundt, Megan Salwei, Douglas Wiegmann, Roger L Brown, Peter Kleinschmidt, Clair Novak, Michael Pulia, Yudi Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. The value of simulation testing for the evaluation of ambient digital scribes: a case report.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nurses' perceptions of the design, implementation, and adoption of machine learning clinical decision support: A descriptive qualitative study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pascale CarayonDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA pcarayon@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4632-6930
Peter HoonakkerCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ann Schoofs HundtCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Megan SalweiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Douglas WiegmannDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Roger L BrownSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Peter KleinschmidtDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Clair NovakUW Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael PuliaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Yudi WangDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Emily WirkusDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Brian PattersonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
Health IT-supported process for preventing and managing VTER01HS022086 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARAYON, PASCALE · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
Improving Antibiotic Stewardship During The Treatment of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in The Emergency Department: A Human Factors and Systems Engineering ApproachK08HS024342 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PULIA, MICHAEL SANTINO · 2016 to 2020
$801k
Preventing Future Falls among Older Adults Presenting to the Emergency DepartmentK08HS024558 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PATTERSON, BRIAN W · 2016 to 2020
$792k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS024342AHRQ HHS K08 HS024558AHRQ HHS R01 HS022086NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this study, we used human factors (HF) methods and principles to design a clinical decision support (CDS) that provides cognitive support to the pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnostic decision-making process in the emergency department. We hypothesised that the application of HF methods and principles will produce a more usable CDS that improves PE diagnostic decision-making, in particular decision about appropriate clinical pathway. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a scenario-based simulation study to compare a HF-based CDS (the so-called CDS for PE diagnosis (PE-Dx CDS)) with a web-based CDS (MDCalc); 32 emergency physicians performed various tasks using both CDS. PE-Dx integrated HF design principles such as automating information acquisition and analysis, and minimising workload. We assessed all three dimensions of usability using both objective and subjective measures: effectiveness (eg, appropriate decision regarding the PE diagnostic pathway), efficiency (eg, time spent, perceived workload) and satisfaction (perceived usability of CDS).

resultsEmergency physicians made more appropriate diagnostic decisions (94% with PE-Dx; 84% with web-based CDS; p<0.01) and performed experimental tasks faster with the PE-Dx CDS (on average 96 s per scenario with PE-Dx; 117 s with web-based CDS; p<0.001). They also reported lower workload (p<0.001) and higher satisfaction (p<0.001) with PE-Dx.

conclusionsThis simulation study shows that HF methods and principles can improve usability of CDS and diagnostic decision-making. Aspects of the HF-based CDS that provided cognitive support to emergency physicians and improved diagnostic performance included automation of information acquisition (eg, auto-populating risk scoring algorithms), minimisation of workload and support of decision selection (eg, recommending a clinical pathway). These HF design principles can be applied to the design of other CDS technologies to improve diagnostic safety.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDecision Support Systems, ClinicalUser-Centered DesignAdultClinical Decision-MakingEfficiencyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePersonal SatisfactionPhysiciansPulmonary EmbolismSurveys and Questionnairesdecision makingdecision support, clinicaldiagnostic errorsemergency departmenthuman factors

Identifiers

PMID31776197
PMCPMC7490974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.